Hi all.
Sometimes I can't resolve some addresses and, in the logs, I can find the
message in the title:
lame-servers: error (FORMERR) resolving [something]
(where `something` is the address I'm trying to resolve).
What does it means?
And how can I resolve this problem?
Thank you!
Thank you.
So it's not my responsibility to resolve the problem, right?
The point is that, sometimes, I can't resolve an address because of this
lame servers, and dig (for example) fails.
Is it possible?
2013/1/8 Shane Kerr sh...@isc.org
Daniele,
On Tuesday, 2013-01-08 09:49:57 +0100
If I use BIND9 forwarding all the queries not belonging to my local zones,
it works.
But if I don't forward those queries, `dig` sometimes (and this is weird)
fails (with connection timed out; no servers could be reached) and the
logs are full of lame server, FORMERR.
Why?
ERRor. The offending server is
marked as lame since it cannot answer queries for the domain in
question.
The message should also include the IP address of the server that it is
going to at the end of the line.
On 08.01.13 13:05, Daniele wrote:
So it's not my responsibility to resolve
/1/8 Kevin Darcy k...@chrysler.com
On 1/8/2013 9:35 AM, Daniele wrote:
If I use BIND9 forwarding all the queries not belonging to my local
zones, it works.
But if I don't forward those queries, `dig` sometimes (and this is weird)
fails (with connection timed out; no servers could be reached
2013/1/9 Phil Mayers p.may...@imperial.ac.uk
On 09/01/13 13:53, Daniele wrote:
This is the scenario.
I installed BIND9 via `apt-get` on a newly installed UBUNTU 12.04,
virtualized on VirtualBox.
The network works properly because if I indicate a different server from
my own BIND9
Port 53 is open, I can also telnet it from another box in the same network.
Now I think the problem can be on the packets size, because I'm trying
every solution but nothing works.
2013/1/9 Lyle Giese l...@lcrcomputer.net
On 01/09/13 08:39, Daniele wrote:
2013/1/9 Phil Mayers p.may
Lyle Giese l...@lcrcomputer.net
On 01/11/13 03:05, Daniele wrote:
Port 53 is open, I can also telnet it from another box in the same network.
Now I think the problem can be on the packets size, because I'm trying
every solution but nothing works.
2013/1/9 Lyle Giese l...@lcrcomputer.net
I'm going crazy.
This is my named.conf
logging {
channel default_logfile {
file /var/cache/bind/logs/default.log;
severity info;
print-category yes;
print-severity yes;
print-time yes;
};
+nodnssec NS .`
The return packets have size of 743 bytes and they all contains infos about
NS for root zone.
2013/1/17 Warren Kumari war...@kumari.net
On Jan 17, 2013, at 9:04 AM, Daniele d.imbrog...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm going crazy.
This is my named.conf
logging
For example, also a `dig a.root-servers.net` fails with SERVFAIL, but in
Wireshark I can see the packet with the correct response that arrives at my
network interface.
2013/1/17 Daniele d.imbrog...@gmail.com
Output for `dig NS .`
; DiG 9.8.1-P1 @127.0.0.1 NS .
; (1 server found)
;; global
These are the outputs. I also attach the file containing them.
; DiG 9.8.1-P1 ns . +norec +noedns @198.41.0.4
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 25625
;; flags: qr ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 13, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 14
;; QUESTION SECTION:
? And why 'named'
doesn't understand the responses from these cache-servers?
2013/1/18 Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org
In message
cal_2sc1szstumpmfceuqrf87nqwe+5n30qvguds7q-4g6va...@mail.gmail.com,
Daniele writes:
These are the outputs. I also attach the file containing them.
; DiG 9.8.1
I'd like to install on Ubuntu 12.04 a DNS server using BIND9.
As a first step, I'd just like to configure it as a forwarder for my box
only.
This is what I do:
1. I deactivate `dnsmasq` editing
`/etc/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.conf` by commenting the `dns=dnsmasq`
line.
Before, the
There are no rules in iptables, and they accept everything by default.
2012/11/25 Phil Mayers p.may...@imperial.ac.uk
On 11/25/2012 04:12 PM, Daniele Imbrogino wrote:
Using Wireshark I can see that there are queries from my IP to a
root-server and replies in the reverse way, but then dig
Using BIND 9.8.1 on Ubuntu 12.04, I try to save the server cache using the
command sudo rndc dumpdb -cache (without quotes, obviously), but then I
can't find the file /etc/bind/named_dump.db being /etc/bind/ the
working directory of the server.
Why?
___
/bind as default working directory, all the files are in
/etc/bind by default.
2012/12/3 Chris Buxton chris.p.bux...@gmail.com
On Dec 3, 2012, at 7:41 AM, Daniele Imbrogino wrote:
Using BIND 9.8.1 on Ubuntu 12.04, I try to save the server cache using
the command sudo rndc dumpdb -cache
resolv.conf contains only 127.0.0.1 as nameserver.
The syslog contains a lot of errors as insecurity proof failed, no valid
RRSIG, got insecure response that I don't understand.
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to
Finally I solved it!
The problem was in the write permission of /etc, while in /var/cache/bind
it works perfectly!
Thank you for the assistance!
2012/12/5 Matus UHLAR - fantomas uh...@fantomas.sk
On 03.12.12 21:32, Daniele Imbrogino wrote:
I edited the working directory to /etc/bind because
No, I don't.
Just for this reason I can't have a cache dump.
Now, in /var, it works!
2012/12/6 Matus UHLAR - fantomas uh...@fantomas.sk
I hope you did not allow BIND writing to /etc...
(/etc should be writable by admins, not daemons, that's why we use /var)
/domain/db.cache
2012/12/5 Sten Carlsen st...@s-carlsen.dk
On 05/12/12 18:29, Hauke Lampe wrote:
On 05.12.2012 14:59, Daniele Imbrogino wrote:
resolv.conf contains only 127.0.0.1 as nameserver.
The syslog contains a lot of errors as insecurity proof failed, no
valid
RRSIG, got insecure
21 matches
Mail list logo
