Gary Wallis wgg1...@gmail.com wrote:
What are the drawbacks, if any, of running only master name servers for the
set of authoritative NSs?
That depends entirely on how you are replicating the zone data.
The DNS's own replication (AXFR, IXFR, NOTIFY, TSIG) is pretty hard to
beat: it is fast,
Thank you Tony and Joseph,
I think you have explained this well, and most importantly, exposed the
underlying issues.
Best regards,
Gary
On 7/14/2014 06:27, Tony Finch wrote:
Gary Wallis wgg1...@gmail.com wrote:
What are the drawbacks, if any, of running only master name servers for the
Hello,
What are the drawbacks, if any, of running only master name servers for
the set of authoritative NSs?
For example given:
[root@rc37 unxsVZ]# dig latimes.com NS +short
dns1.tribune.com.
dns2.tribune.com.
dns4.tribune.com.
dns3.tribune.com.
Where all 4 dnsN servers are in fact masters
.tribune.com.
Where all 4 dnsN servers are in fact masters (this is just a hypothetical,
the NS above are most likely secondary
servers)
why do you start the same thread again?
Original-Nachricht
Betreff: Re: Public facing authoritative NS all masters
Datum: Sat, 12 Jul
DNS experts,
What are the drawbacks, if any, of running only master name servers for
the set of authoritative NSs?
For example given:
[root@rc37 unxsVZ]# dig latimes.com NS +short
dns1.tribune.com.
dns2.tribune.com.
dns4.tribune.com.
dns3.tribune.com.
Where all 4 dnsN servers are in fact
Am 12.07.2014 16:11, schrieb Gary Wallis:
DNS experts,
What are the drawbacks, if any, of running only master name servers for the
set of authoritative NSs?
For example given:
[root@rc37 unxsVZ]# dig latimes.com NS +short
dns1.tribune.com.
dns2.tribune.com.
dns4.tribune.com.
6 matches
Mail list logo