Re: DNSSEC regulatory requirements?
For .nl, we give registrars discount if their domain names comply to a number of standards, including DNSSEC [1]. Afaik, also .se and .ch have similar incentives. And in the Netherlands, also government websites have to comply to a number of standards, like DNSSEC [2]. — Moritz [1] https://www.sidn.nl/en/news-and-blogs/majority-of-dutch-domains-and-internet-users-have-dnssec-security [2] https://www.forumstandaardisatie.nl/open-standaarden/verplicht > On 5 Apr 2023, at 11:04, Klaus Malorny wrote: > > On 04.04.23 15:11, Josh Kuo wrote: >> Hi all, >> [...] >> The only one I know of is the very dated US OMB memo from 2008. I see >> several European domains have better DNSSEC deployment rates (such as .de). >> Are there any regulations or friendly recommendations from some kind of >> governing body at work here? >> Thank you. >> -Josh > > Hi Josh, > > at least not in Germany/.de. There may be rules for governmental domain > names, but not for the general public/commercial domains. Other European > ccTLD registry have/had promotions for DNSSEC, so this might be the reason > for higher deployment rates. > > Greetings, > Klaus > > > -- > Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from > this list > > ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. > Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. > > > bind-users mailing list > bind-users@lists.isc.org > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP -- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Re: DNSSEC regulatory requirements?
On Wed, Apr 05, 2023 at 11:04:10AM +0200, Klaus Malorny wrote: > On 04.04.23 15:11, Josh Kuo wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > [...] > > > > The only one I know of is the very dated US OMB memo from 2008. I see > > several European domains have better DNSSEC deployment rates (such as > > .de). Are there any regulations or friendly recommendations from some > > kind of governing body at work here? > > > > Thank you. > > > > -Josh > > > > Hi Josh, > > at least not in Germany/.de. There may be rules for governmental domain > names, but not for the general public/commercial domains. Other European > ccTLD registry have/had promotions for DNSSEC, so this might be the reason > for higher deployment rates. > > Greetings, > Klaus I think at least one Scandinavian country had a tax incentive to encourage DNSSEC adoption, but no regulatory requirement. cheers, raf -- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Re: DNSSEC regulatory requirements?
On 04.04.23 15:11, Josh Kuo wrote: Hi all, [...] The only one I know of is the very dated US OMB memo from 2008. I see several European domains have better DNSSEC deployment rates (such as .de). Are there any regulations or friendly recommendations from some kind of governing body at work here? Thank you. -Josh Hi Josh, at least not in Germany/.de. There may be rules for governmental domain names, but not for the general public/commercial domains. Other European ccTLD registry have/had promotions for DNSSEC, so this might be the reason for higher deployment rates. Greetings, Klaus -- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
