Re: Is 10.in-addr.arpa not recommended?

2010-09-28 Thread Kevin Darcy
On 9/27/2010 8:48 PM, donovan jeffrey j wrote: I run a number of internal clients on 10 address space. what i did was break up each Zone into Class B's 10.1.x.x , 10.2.x.x then my forward and reverse files into class C's. Each record 10.1.1.x . 10.1.2.x, 10.1.3.x, . then scale ass needed.

Re: Is 10.in-addr.arpa not recommended?

2010-09-27 Thread Chris Buxton
On Sep 27, 2010, at 1:03 PM, Christopher Cain wrote: Hi all. I am setting up a new appliance-based DNS solution that will contain a fair number of separately managed Windows DNS slave servers (in addition to the DNS appliances that will handle the . Currently there are just over 8000

Re: Is 10.in-addr.arpa not recommended?

2010-09-27 Thread Sten Carlsen
While a single zone is perfectly fine from a standards point of view, some clients might be served addresses they don't like 10.x.x.0 and 10.x.x.255. Just a reminder that this could be a reason if something appears weird. On 27/09/10 23:07, Chris Buxton wrote: On Sep 27, 2010, at 1:03 PM,

Re: Is 10.in-addr.arpa not recommended?

2010-09-27 Thread Warren Kumari
On Sep 27, 2010, at 6:55 PM, Sten Carlsen wrote: While a single zone is perfectly fine from a standards point of view, some clients might be served addresses they don't like 10.x.x.0 and 10.x.x.255. But that would be DHCP config, no? Just a reminder that this could be a reason if

Re: Is 10.in-addr.arpa not recommended?

2010-09-27 Thread Chris Buxton
On Sep 27, 2010, at 3:55 PM, Sten Carlsen wrote: While a single zone is perfectly fine from a standards point of view, some clients might be served addresses they don't like 10.x.x.0 and 10.x.x.255. Just a reminder that this could be a reason if something appears weird. Don't confuse

Re: Is 10.in-addr.arpa not recommended?

2010-09-27 Thread Chris Buxton
On Sep 27, 2010, at 4:43 PM, Sten Carlsen wrote: Well, it depends on your clients. If they don't like .0 or .255, you would have to have a rather large amount of ranges. E.g. range 10.1.1.1 10.1.1.254; range 10.1.2.1 10.1.2.254; .. If OTOH you don't have any of those clients, other

Re: Is 10.in-addr.arpa not recommended?

2010-09-27 Thread donovan jeffrey j
On Sep 27, 2010, at 4:03 PM, Christopher Cain wrote: Hi all. I am setting up a new appliance-based DNS solution that will contain a fair number of separately managed Windows DNS slave servers (in addition to the DNS appliances that will handle the . Currently there are just over 8000

Re: Is 10.in-addr.arpa not recommended?

2010-09-27 Thread Sten Carlsen
On 28/09/10 2:08, Chris Buxton wrote: On Sep 27, 2010, at 4:43 PM, Sten Carlsen wrote: Well, it depends on your clients. If they don't like .0 or .255, you would have to have a rather large amount of ranges. E.g. range 10.1.1.1 10.1.1.254; range 10.1.2.1 10.1.2.254; .. If OTOH you