-
From: online-reg online-...@enigmedia.com
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Sent: Sunday, October 03, 2010 9:47 AM
Subject: Re: multiple slave zones pointing to same file?
IME the best way to do this on a Unix'y system is to use hard links.
That way if you ever need to change one of them
The slave files do not carry the @ I presume you are using on
the master -- the zone-transfer data includes the specific domain
names -- so the slave files can't be shared even if they could be
shared.
Maybe you can write a program that translates the slave data
into the sharable format, and
Simply set the file option to the same name on the slave server.
On 10/2/2010 2:59 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
On 10/2/2010 11:16 AM, online-reg wrote:
Hi All: I’m building a new Bind 9.7.1-P2 slave server and am taking an
opportunity to review my conf files.
I have a number of zones on the
In message 58f2f2eb90f24743a050575c87c7c...@nyoffice.enigmedia.local, online
-reg writes:
Hi All: Iâm building a new Bind 9.7.1-P2 slave server and am taking an
opportunity to review my conf files.
I have a number of zones on the primary that all point to the same zone
configuration
Doesn't support it? Since when does named not allow you to use the
same file name for more then one zone? I've been doing that for several
years.
-- John Wingenbach
On 10/2/2010 6:49 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
In message58f2f2eb90f24743a050575c87c7c...@nyoffice.enigmedia.local, online
-reg
In message 4ca7b926.9070...@wingenbach.org, John Wingenbach writes:
Doesn't support it?
Correct. It is not supported. Don't take the fact that it doesn't
complain as evidence that this is supported practice. The only
place where shared file use is supported is in static master zones.
On 10/2/2010 3:15 PM, online-reg wrote:
IME the best way to do this on a Unix'y system is to use hard links.
That way if you ever need to change one of them to be its own file
it's trivial to do so. Also IME, BIND doesn't react well to having
multiple slave zones sharing the same file, but that
7 matches
Mail list logo
