On Fri, Mar 25, 2016, at 05:03 PM, Evan Hunt wrote:
> (And I didn't even remember to mention the fact that some DLZ modules now
> support DNS UPDATE, which means you can have *dynamic* dynamically loadable
> Dynamically Loadable Zones zones. It's a good thing we work on name
> servers here at ISC
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 11:59:41PM +, Evan Hunt wrote:
> (The name "Dynamically Loadable Zones" is, in retrospect, unfortunate. Now
> that it's possible to load DLZ modules at runtime with dlopen(), that means
> you can have dynamically loadable Dynamically Loadable Zones zones. Sorry
> about
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 03:54:34PM -0700, PGNd wrote:
> I'm a mite confused about what the summary's telling me then.
>
> If I remove the 'unncessary' config items, the summary reports:
>
> Dynamically loadable zone (DLZ) drivers:
> None
>
> To my read, that says NO drivers will be
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016, at 03:48 PM, Evan Hunt wrote:
> To use the runtime-linkable modules, all you need is "configure".
> (The "--with-dlopen" part is enabled by default already, and the
> others are unnecessary.)
>
> Then "cd contrib/dlz/modules/bdbhpt" (or whichever one you want to use),
>
> Right. I was just referring to the *docs*, which afaict are still the most
> complete, conceptually re: DLZ anyway
>
> IIUC (?), I'm correctly invoking with at
>
> ./configure ...
> --with-dlz-postgres=no \
> --with-dlz-mysql=no \
> --with-dlz-bdb=/usr/local/dlz-bdb \
Thanks for the quick reply.
> These still work but are somewhat obsolete now. BIND now has the ability to
> dynamically load DLZ modules at run time
Right. I was just referring to the *docs*, which afaict are still the most
complete, conceptually re: DLZ anyway
IIUC (?), I'm correctly
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 01:40:29PM -0700, PGNd wrote:
> In DLZ, as packaged with bind9, currently a variety of db drivers are
> supported,
>
> grep "AC_ARG_WITH(dlz_" contrib/dlz/config.dlz.in
> AC_ARG_WITH(dlz_postgres,
> AC_ARG_WITH(dlz_mysql,
> AC_ARG_WITH(dlz_bdb,
7 matches
Mail list logo
