On 01/17/2017 07:15 AM, Andrzej Oleś wrote:
Thanks Martin!
I see your point - then I suggest that at least the call to
`devtools::install` is guarded by a customized more informative error
massage, something along the lines:
Package 'devtools' missing: please install it (e.g., by a call to
Hi,
On 01/14/2017 03:01 AM, Lluís Revilla wrote:
> Dear Valerie and all,
>
> If I understood the page you kindly linked correctly, a package is deprecated:
> 1) When it fails to build and check (unless it is fixed).
> 2) When the maintainer asks for it.
> 3) If the maintainer is unresponsive (I
Ah - sorry - upon re-reading your message, I realized I misunderstood
your question. So basically you want to make your LRT p-value one-sided;
I can see how that would be useful, e.g., when comparing to negative
controls in ChIP-seq or other technologies.
I've been doing it fairly simply,
Hi Dario,
I guess so - it would be a fairly easy extension of glmLRT - but why? I
can't think of many situations where a non-zero log-fold change is
expected under the null hypothesis. Mixture experiments, or correcting
for gene dosage due to copy number variants, perhaps.
Cheers,
Aaron
On
