Vince's answer gives the official position, to which I'll add my
personal opinions for my little corner of the world.
Every previous release, I had routine rounds of "depiping" where I go
through any package that I'm heavily involved in and strip out any %>%
calls. I think I've gotten the
On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 4:40 AM Venu Thatikonda
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As the title says, is %>% acceptable in bioc packages? With BiocCheck, I
> get a WARNING that is "Add non-empty \\value sections to the following man
> pages: man/pipe.Rd".
>
Yes magrittr is acceptable. The warning says (I think)
Hi,
As the title says, is %>% acceptable in bioc packages? With BiocCheck, I
get a WARNING that is "Add non-empty \\value sections to the following man
pages: man/pipe.Rd".
Is it okay even if this warning appears ? `R CMD check` didn't give
warnings about it.
Thank you.
--
Best regards
Venu
