Hi Sarvesh,
All I see is that seqArchR fails on palomino4 because Python module
'packaging' is not available on that machine.
The module seems to be available on the other builders though so no
problem there.
Anyways if your package depends on that module (and it seems that it
does, via
Hi Vince,
I did attempt to use basilisk for seqArchR, but met with some errors then.
See https://github.com/LTLA/basilisk/issues/13
If anyone has tried basilisk with BiocParallel, I will be happy to reach
out and find a way to mediate via basilisk.
I will write to you separately with more
My suggestion is that your interfaces to python be mediated with the
basilisk package. Please
contact me off line if you need assistance; see BiocSklearn for an example;
I am sure there are
others.
On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 12:31 PM Sarvesh Nikumbh
wrote:
> Hi bioc team,
>
> My package seqArchR
Hi bioc team,
My package seqArchR though does not error in any way, but can spit out
numerous warnings (originally from Python/scikit-learn which is a
dependency) depending on the version of scikit-learn available. This fills
the output to the extent that it is unreadable. The cause for this is
