resolved.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>>
>>
>> Lori Shepherd
>>
>> Bioconductor Core Team
>>
>> Roswell Park Cancer Institute
>>
>> Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics
>>
>> Elm & Carlton Streets
>>
o: Michael Lawrence; Tim Triche, Jr.
Cc: packa...@bioconductor.org<mailto:packa...@bioconductor.org>; bioc-devel
Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] avoiding circular dependencies between a Data package
and a Software package
I forgot to add the .BBSoptions file should be located at the 'top' level of
the packag
ori Shepherd
>
> Bioconductor Core Team
>
> Roswell Park Cancer Institute
>
> Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics
>
> Elm & Carlton Streets
>
> Buffalo, New York 14263
> ------
> *From:* Bioc-devel on behalf of
> Obenchain, Valerie
> *Sent:* Sunday
ets
Buffalo, New York 14263
From: Bioc-devel on behalf of Obenchain,
Valerie
Sent: Sunday, October 7, 2018 11:54:46 AM
To: Michael Lawrence; Tim Triche, Jr.
Cc: packa...@bioconductor.org; bioc-devel
Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] avoiding circular dependencies between a
I forgot to add the .BBSoptions file should be located at the 'top' level of
the package, e.g., MTseekerData/.BBSoptions. You might as well add that now
instead of waiting until the packages are approved. I think the SPB was
modified to be aware of the .BBSoptions file so it may require it too
Hi Tim,
As Michael said, the usual case is the data package 'Suggests' the software and
the software 'Depends' or 'Imports' the data but this dependency could be
reversed.
When submitting a combo of packages to the SPB for review, the package that
'Suggests' is submitted first followed by the
I think you're doing the right thing, suggesting the data package from the
software package. This might require some manual intervention on the build
system side to ensure that the software package is installed before passing
full check, so that the data package can be installed/checked and
Last night I submitted MTseeker and its companion package MTseekerData,
both festooned with examples that run smoothly and pass BiocCheck.
HOWEVER! Breaking up the data into a Data package inadvertently seems to
have created a circular dependency between the Software and Data packages.
I haven't
