Re: [Bioc-devel] mcols<-() behaviour inheriting from Vector vs GRanges

Fantastic, thanks Herve. On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 1:32 AM, Hervé Pagès wrote: > This is fixed in S4Vectors release (0.8.6) and devel (0.9.16). > > Cheers, > H. > > > On 01/04/2016 11:52 AM, Hervé Pagès wrote: > >> Hi Malcolm, >> >> Thanks for reporting this. Will fix. >> >>

Re: [Bioc-devel] mcols<-() behaviour inheriting from Vector vs GRanges

Hi Malcolm, Thanks for reporting this. Will fix. H. On 01/04/2016 10:53 AM, Malcolm Perry wrote: Hello, A recent question on the support site ( https://support.bioconductor.org/p/76430/#76460) shows that the mcols assignment in GRanges (and perhaps others) is subtly different from classes

[Bioc-devel] mcols<-() behaviour inheriting from Vector vs GRanges

Hello, A recent question on the support site ( https://support.bioconductor.org/p/76430/#76460) shows that the mcols assignment in GRanges (and perhaps others) is subtly different from classes that purely inherit from Vector (such as GenomicInteractions in the example), as the GRanges method will

Re: [Bioc-devel] mcols<-() behaviour inheriting from Vector vs GRanges

This is fixed in S4Vectors release (0.8.6) and devel (0.9.16). Cheers, H. On 01/04/2016 11:52 AM, Hervé Pagès wrote: Hi Malcolm, Thanks for reporting this. Will fix. H. On 01/04/2016 10:53 AM, Malcolm Perry wrote: Hello, A recent question on the support site (