Re: [Bioc-devel] workflow page reorganization

2017-12-17 Thread Wolfgang Huber
Thank you all for the efforts on this! I agree with Mike that there's a lot of yet untapped potential in the workflows, for all levels of BioC users: for beginners, to make their first steps, for more experienced users, to learn new stuff. Mike's points 1-5 are great, I second them. And then

Re: [Bioc-devel] workflow page reorganization

2017-12-15 Thread Shepherd, Lori
2017 10:27:55 AM To: Aaron Lun Cc: bioc-devel@r-project.org Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] workflow page reorganization Hi Aaron, thank you for taking the lead. I've merged your suggested categories with my preliminary arrangement (which just went online). I've also included an index at th

Re: [Bioc-devel] workflow page reorganization

2017-12-15 Thread Michael Love
This already looks much improved, thanks Andrzej and Aaron. I think workflows are where it's at, and this page is probably underappreciated by Bioconductor users and the outside community. My wishlist for the workflows page, which may exceed what is available for the current effort: 1) It should

Re: [Bioc-devel] workflow page reorganization

2017-12-15 Thread Aaron Lun
Thanks Andrzej. And yes, I just put in a PR; I hope itemized sublists for a particular workflow (i.e., mine) aren't too ambitious. I'm thinking about whether "Epigenetics" is the right section heading. For greatest generality, you could call it "Genome regulation", which bundles all genomic bin

Re: [Bioc-devel] workflow page reorganization

2017-12-15 Thread Andrzej Oleś
Hi Aaron, thank you for taking the lead. I've merged your suggested categories with my preliminary arrangement (which just went online). I've also included an index at the beginning of the page. Any refinements are of course welcome, e.g. via PR to https://github.com/Bioconductor/bioconductor.org

Re: [Bioc-devel] workflow page reorganization

2017-12-15 Thread Andrzej Oleś
Hi Laurent, thanks, we might consider this in the future. To get us going, for the moment we will probably just rearrange the website manually. On the technical note: even though workflows are now fully fledged packages, two documents linked from https://bioconductor.org/help/workflows are just s

Re: [Bioc-devel] workflow page reorganization

2017-12-15 Thread Andrzej Oleś
Hi, Motivated by discussions with Aaron I've already started to group the workflows on the page (but this change didn't propagate to the website yet). Some common topics I was able to identify so far include: - Beginner's Worklows authored originally by the core team giving a quite broad overview

Re: [Bioc-devel] workflow page reorganization

2017-12-15 Thread Aaron Lun
My proposed categories reflect my vested interests, but here goes: - Gene expression: - rnaseqGene - RNAseq123 - ExpressionNormalizationWorkflow - RnaSeqGeneEdgeRQL - Epigenomics: (not quite sure what to call this) - chipseqDB - methylationArrayAnalysis - generegulatio

Re: [Bioc-devel] workflow page reorganization

2017-12-15 Thread Laurent Gatto
On 15 December 2017 12:33, Shepherd, Lori wrote: > Hello all, > > > There has been a request to reorganize the workflow page as workflows > have grown past basic and advanced. > > http://bioconductor.org/help/workflows/ > > We wanted to check with the community what your thoughts were for > categ

[Bioc-devel] workflow page reorganization

2017-12-15 Thread Shepherd, Lori
Hello all, There has been a request to reorganize the workflow page as workflows have grown past basic and advanced. http://bioconductor.org/help/workflows/ We wanted to check with the community what your thoughts were for categories. Thank you for your suggestions. Lori Shepherd Biocon