Thanks all!
Changing to 4.0 still produced the warning but I'll ignore it as was
recommended.
Sunny
On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 2:20 PM Felix Ernst
wrote:
> Hi Sunny,
>
> I would venture a guess and suggest that is about the too fined grained
> version you defined in the DESCRIPTION file.
>
> I woul
it's a warning and you should ignore it. We will try to improve the check.
Martin
On 4/3/20, 2:14 PM, "Bioc-devel on behalf of Sunny Jones"
wrote:
Hello,
I'm in the process of submitting two packages to Bioconductor, MOMA and its
associated data package moma.gbmexample. I kee
Hi Sunny,
I would venture a guess and suggest that is about the too fined grained version
you defined in the DESCRIPTION file.
I would suggest, that you try to define an R version, which follows the format
x.y and not x.y.z. So for you that would be R (>= 4.0).
Hope that works,
Felix
-Ur
If you have compressed data it can be ignored.
4.0.0 is what the package would be released under so I recommend that.
Lori Shepherd
Bioconductor Core Team
Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center
Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics
Elm & Carlton Streets
Buffalo, New York 14263
___
