On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Hervé Pagès wrote:
> On 05/21/2013 06:37 PM, Michael Lawrence wrote:
>
>> It's clear we're not going to agree. I will volunteer to maintain these,
>> OK? I will maintain them anyway for my own use.
>>
>
> That's fine with me. I didn't mean we shouldn't have those
On 05/21/2013 06:37 PM, Michael Lawrence wrote:
It's clear we're not going to agree. I will volunteer to maintain these,
OK? I will maintain them anyway for my own use.
That's fine with me. I didn't mean we shouldn't have those wrappers (and
I think Martin or Val are going to come back here wit
*Added bioc-devel; hope you don't mind*
Hector,
This is great stuff. The overall design is on the right track. As you said,
there's a bit of cleaning to do, but I think we should merge this into svn
and work the rest out from there. This will really benefit performance,
especially for visualizati
Perhaps you should contact the maintainer of the package you are referring
to, and please also state which package it is.
Kasper
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Dario Strbenac
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In the documentation of maPlot, it doesn't state that the fold change is
> calculated as y / x. It
