- Original Message -
From: Wolfgang Huber whu...@embl.de
To: Dan Tenenbaum dtene...@fredhutch.org
Cc: bioc-devel@r-project.org
Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2015 4:03:54 AM
Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] Use and Usability metrics / shields
Can it be that the “in Bioc” shield is
I agree with Wolfgang that the semantics of [ are being violated here. It
would though help if you could be a little less vague about your intent.
What is this data structure going to store, how should it behave?
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 3:35 AM, Christian Arnold christian.arn...@embl.de
wrote:
The common shield convention is to use blue or orange when the information
is not qualitatively good or bad, but the color choice is just subjective
in the end.
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Martin Morgan mtmor...@fredhutch.org
wrote:
On 05/10/2015 11:39 AM, COMMO Frederic wrote:
Dear
- Original Message -
From: Jim Hester james.f.hes...@gmail.com
To: Martin Morgan mtmor...@fredhutch.org
Cc: bioc-devel@r-project.org
Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2015 7:53:03 AM
Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] Use and Usability metrics / shields
The common shield convention is to use blue or
Hi there,
I am about to develop a Bioconductor package that implements a custom S4
object, and I am currently thinking about a few issues, including the
following:
Say we have an S4 object that stores a lot of information in different
slots. Assume that it does make sense to extract
Can it be that the “in Bioc” shield is incorrect?
For instance, it says “9.98 years” for vsn but the first commit was in Oct 2002
Curiously “9.98 years” is stated for many old packages - surely we can use R
for more precise date arithmetic?
Cheers
Wolfgang
On May 13, 2015, at
