Re: [Bioc-devel] Update released version of Package

That is correct, if you are using the git mirror, check out the release branch by doing: git checkout release-3.2 Make your changes, commit, and push. The same guidelines about version numbers and only backporting essential fixes apply. When you are done you probably want to git checkout

Re: [Bioc-devel] Update released version of Package

Thanks Dan. If I am using the git mirror i should just checkout the Release branch and push. That is what I can tell from the documentation. Venkat > On Jan 4, 2016, at 12:35 PM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote: > > Check out the release version from SVN at > >

Re: [Bioc-devel] Update released version of Package

Something for a developer FAQ? Kind regards Wolfgang > On 4 Jan 2016, at 19:35, Dan Tenenbaum wrote: > > Check out the release version from SVN at > > https://hedgehog.fhcrc.org/bioconductor/branches/RELEASE_3_2/madman/Rpacks/YOURPACKAGENAME > > Make the fixes. > >

Re: [Bioc-devel] Update released version of Package

Thanks that all helps. Will look into updating accordingly. Venkat > On Jan 4, 2016, at 12:56 PM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote: > > Maybe; it's already here: > > http://bioconductor.org/developers/how-to/source-control/#committing-changes-to-the-release-branch > > Dan > > >

Re: [Bioc-devel] mcols<-() behaviour inheriting from Vector vs GRanges

Hi Malcolm, Thanks for reporting this. Will fix. H. On 01/04/2016 10:53 AM, Malcolm Perry wrote: Hello, A recent question on the support site ( https://support.bioconductor.org/p/76430/#76460) shows that the mcols assignment in GRanges (and perhaps others) is subtly different from classes

Re: [Bioc-devel] Update released version of Package

Maybe; it's already here: http://bioconductor.org/developers/how-to/source-control/#committing-changes-to-the-release-branch Dan - Original Message - > From: "Wolfgang Huber" > To: "Dan Tenenbaum" > Cc: "bioc-devel" >

[Bioc-devel] Updated package submission policies

Bioconductors -- we intend to change the way new packages are submitted and reviewed before being added to the Bioconductor repository. Please see additional detail on the support site at https://support.bioconductor.org/p/76472/. Best wishes, Martin This email message may contain legally

[Bioc-devel] mcols<-() behaviour inheriting from Vector vs GRanges

Hello, A recent question on the support site ( https://support.bioconductor.org/p/76430/#76460) shows that the mcols assignment in GRanges (and perhaps others) is subtly different from classes that purely inherit from Vector (such as GenomicInteractions in the example), as the GRanges method will

Re: [Bioc-devel] mcols<-() behaviour inheriting from Vector vs GRanges

This is fixed in S4Vectors release (0.8.6) and devel (0.9.16). Cheers, H. On 01/04/2016 11:52 AM, Hervé Pagès wrote: Hi Malcolm, Thanks for reporting this. Will fix. H. On 01/04/2016 10:53 AM, Malcolm Perry wrote: Hello, A recent question on the support site (

[Bioc-devel] Update released version of Package

Hi, I noticed that in release 3.2 of my package some functions were never exported. I have fixed this on the devel branch, but what is the best way for me to fix this on the release 3.3? Venkat UT Southwestern Medical Center The future of medicine,

Re: [Bioc-devel] Update released version of Package

Check out the release version from SVN at https://hedgehog.fhcrc.org/bioconductor/branches/RELEASE_3_2/madman/Rpacks/YOURPACKAGENAME Make the fixes. Be sure to bump the version number accordingly, that is, do NOT make it the same as the version number in devel. Bump only the last segment (z