So a preliminary diagnosis is that some packages are not building even though
they build in the nightly builds. The problem could be a newer compiler, newer
R-devel, slightly different OS (debian vs ubuntu) or something else.
Investigating further. However, in the meantime,
Can you be more specific about which docker image you pulled?
Dan
- Original Message -
> From: "Federico Marini"
> To: "Martin Morgan" , "bioc-devel"
>
> Sent: Thursday, March 3, 2016 1:20:46 AM
> Subject:
Thank you all for the useful suggestions and links.
I like the idea of using a CC0 license. That's likely what I will go for.
Best,
davide
On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 7:42 AM Tim Triche, Jr. wrote:
> I was going to mention droit d'auteur under EU common law, but somehow
>
Using the integrated help system is nice, but isn't always ideal.
Just for example: when I'm ssh'd into my work cluster I don't get a nice web
page, I instead get the ascii-formatted version, which is considerably harder
to read and doesn't include proper links. Running a second local instance
I can reproduce the error quite consistently by running either R CMD build or
by sourcing the Stangled vignette.
Here is my sessionInfo after doing the latter. If you are running an older R
devel please update it.
> sessionInfo()
R Under development (unstable) (2016-02-25 r70222)
Platform:
There are a number of variables defined. You could check to see if the variable
BBS_HOME is defined (it does not matter what the value is in your case, just
whether it is defined or not).
Dan
- Original Message -
> From: "Thomas Dybdal Pedersen"
> To:
Are you using R-devel on your computer?
- Original Message -
> From: "Wolfgang Kaisers"
> To: "bioc-devel"
> Sent: Friday, March 4, 2016 12:41:30 AM
> Subject: [Bioc-devel] spliceSites Vignette build error
> Dear All,
>
>
I am pretty sure in general "data" is not copyrightable per se (
http://www.lib.umich.edu/copyright/facts-and-data), so while I might
contact the original authors as a courtesy, if the data has been released
into any public database, then you should be free to do with it as you
please. Providing
Hi,
this is just to clarify the relation between the two github repos
https://github.com/Bioconductor-mirror/BiocStyle and
https://github.com/Bioconductor/BiocStyle mentioned by Martin: actually,
these two are perfectly in sync right now. The "This branch is 3 commits
ahead, 3 commits behind
One thing about accessing the html versions locally (e.g., via ? with
options(help_type="html")] or help.start() or Rstudio) is that you get the
version relevant to your R / Bioconductor, rather than whatever is at the top
of google; I guess the same applies to the pdf versions, and the reason
Hi
Are there any environment variables set on the bloc build machines that unique
identify them as such? The reason I ask is that I’m planning to create a
testthat PR that adds a skip_on_bioc (similar to skip_on_cran) function. While
I know you generally shouldn’t skip unit tests on build
Dear all,
Thanks a lot for your help. I managed to commit the new version of the
package to the release branch.
Many thanks again for your replies.
Best,
Sandro
On 3 Mar 2016 16:28, "Dan Tenenbaum" wrote:
> You can merge from devel into release (as long as it's only bug
12 matches
Mail list logo