Re: [Bioc-devel] Duplicate commit error on and off

Sure, it’s pretty long but here it is: git show 8210e1e04e8dc6819b84820077293d8d61914cf5 commit 8210e1e04e8dc6819b84820077293d8d61914cf5 Author: Kevin Horan Date: Fri Jun 30 21:37:15 2017 + fix for RSQLite 2 git-svn-id:

Re: [Bioc-devel] Duplicate commit error on and off

Dear Thomas, Can you please send me the output of the two `git show` commands? > git show 8210e1e04e8dc6819b84820077293d8d61914cf5 > git show f514d35b793e1d9462b899bf3c76cc06ab4dcc91 I’ll need to take a look at those to advice accordingly. Best, Nitesh > On Sep 7, 2017, at 7:04 PM, Thomas

Re: [Bioc-devel] experimental data packages and git-lfs

Hi Levi, On 09/07/2017 02:52 PM, Levi Waldron wrote: Thanks, Nitesh! See below: On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 4:21 PM, Turaga, Nitesh < nitesh.tur...@roswellpark.org> wrote: Hi Levi, I’m not sure what you mean by tracked vs checked. Sorry, I meant whether there are any differences in the way

Re: [Bioc-devel] problem with git / svn transition: ssh keys

Hi Luo, The key we have on file is missing the starting `ssh-rsa`. Could you please resubmit? Best, Nitesh > On Sep 7, 2017, at 5:04 PM, Luo Weijun wrote: > > Just want to make sure that you see my email below. I still have the same > problem at this time. > Weijun

Re: [Bioc-devel] experimental data packages and git-lfs

Thanks, Nitesh! See below: On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 4:21 PM, Turaga, Nitesh < nitesh.tur...@roswellpark.org> wrote: > Hi Levi, > > I’m not sure what you mean by tracked vs checked. > Sorry, I meant whether there are any differences in the way software and experimental data packages are handled by

Re: [Bioc-devel] experimental data packages and git-lfs

Hi Levi, I’m not sure what you mean by tracked vs checked. On another note, I have explored your package a little on GitHub (waldronLab/curatedOvarianData), and I’ve noticed that the data files there are stored as LFS files. As long as you don’t add the .gitattributes file in upstream, you

Re: [Bioc-devel] role of replaceSlots in BiocGenerics

Totally agree that the methods package could have a better API and better documentation. Michael On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Hervé Pagès wrote: > On 09/06/2017 03:51 PM, Michael Lawrence wrote: >> >> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 2:23 PM, Hervé Pagès

[Bioc-devel] eLife supports development of open technology stack for publishing reproducible manuscripts online

Hi all, I thought you might be interested in our announcement that eLife, in collaboration with Substance and Stencila, is supporting a project to create a full, open technology stack for authoring, compiling and publishing computationally reproducible manuscripts online. Currently, researchers