Hi Will,
Let's keep this on the mailing list.
On 1/13/20 16:00, William Chen wrote:
> Hi Herve,
>
> Thanks for this reply. I have been looking into the R CMD CHECK error
> that has been thrown by the tokay1 builder and am still unsure how to
> potentially mitigate the error message given.
>
Hi,
I'm the developer of the package rSWeeP, and I'm trying to activate my
account at Bioconductor Git Credentials (
https://git.bioconductor.org/BiocCredentials/account_activation/)
and I keep receiving the message " danrle...@gmail.com is not associated
with a maintainer of a Bioconductor
We will be updating R-devel on the Bioconductor devel builders this afternoon
(malbec2 and tokay2). This may mean some intermittent download on the Single
Package Builder. It should not affect the build report for today. We
appreciate your understanding.
Lori Shepherd
Bioconductor Core
Assume the object is backed by an HDF5 or Zarr array, for the sake of argument
and because that’s kind of how it works these days for many people. Also assume
the “SE*” may not actually be an SE, but rather some wacky subclass of SE.
If you return a new SE*, you need to copy all the metadata,
Dear all,
Assume we have a SummarizedExperiment object `se` that contains raw count data,
and a method `doProcess` that processes the data to produce a matrix of
identical dimensions (for example log-transformation, normalisation,
imputation, ...). What are the opinions in favour or against
