Re: [Bioc-devel] Common workflow to build an microarray annatation package, like hgu133a.db

Hi Tim, I posted the question here is because Maintainers of most of the annotation pacakage is Bioconductor Package Maintainer, though I posted at the support website (https://support.bioconductor.org/p/76545/). Probably there should be a common workflow to handle this kind of problem for the

Re: [Bioc-devel] Common workflow to build an microarray annatation package, like hgu133a.db

On Jan 5, 2016 7:01 PM, "Tim Triche, Jr." wrote: > > 1) this is a support.bioconductor.org question > 2) don't use .db0 packages, you will rue the day you did Can you expand on this statement? Right now all of the ChipDb are built using a db0 package, so it's not clear to

[Bioc-devel] Common workflow to build an microarray annatation package, like hgu133a.db

Hello, Happy new year. What is the common work-flow to build an microarray annotation package, like hgu133a.db. For some array, there are probe sequences available, then maybe mapping is used? While for other situations, how to deal with? If code used by the team available, that will be great.

Re: [Bioc-devel] Common workflow to build an microarray annatation package, like hgu133a.db

1) this is a support.bioconductor.org question 2) don't use .db0 packages, you will rue the day you did best, --t On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 3:53 PM, Zhilong Jia wrote: > Hello, > > Happy new year. > > What is the common work-flow to build an microarray annotation package, >