rom: Tim Peters
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2019 8:58 PM
To: Turaga, Nitesh
Cc: Bioc-devel ; Shepherd, Lori
Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] DMRcate_2.0.0 and updated DMRcatedata
Thanks Nitesh,
The only reason DMRcatedata isn't passing BiocCheck is because of package
numbering and the fact that
Thanks Nitesh,
The only reason DMRcatedata isn't passing BiocCheck is because of package
numbering and the fact that the old version already exists - which this new
version is supposed to overwrite
Thanks Tim. The assigned reviewer will review your package and provide
suggestions as needed.
Best,
Nitesh
> On Sep 12, 2019, at 3:15 AM, Tim Peters wrote:
>
> Hi Nitesh,
>
> Thanks, I have transformed DMRcatedata into an ExperimentHub package and
> started an issue here
>
Hi Tim,
Based on what your have mentioned, it seems that DMRcatedata should become an
experiment hub package.
https://bioconductor.org/packages/devel/bioc/vignettes/ExperimentHub/inst/doc/CreateAnExperimentHubPackage.html
Please take a look that vignette.
Let me know if you have any
Hello,
I have a major update of DMRcate and its associated data package,
DMRcatedata. They both pass R CMD check and BiocCheck for R 3.6.1.
Because the new version of DMRcate depends on the updated DMRcatedata
package,
can I host DMRcatedata (it's ~28MB) somewhere for you to
