Re: [Bioc-devel] Fw: MungeSumstats Bioconductor

2024-03-01 Thread Hervé Pagès
February 2024 18:58 > *To:* alan murphy ; Bioc-devel@r-project.org > > *Subject:* Re: [Bioc-devel] Fw: MungeSumstats Bioconductor > > Hi Alan, > > The specs of the Linux servers have not changed. > > However we've recently observed some of these random kills by

Re: [Bioc-devel] Fw: MungeSumstats Bioconductor

2024-02-21 Thread alan murphy
, Alan. From: Herv� Pag�s Sent: Tuesday 6 February 2024 18:58 To: alan murphy ; Bioc-devel@r-project.org Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] Fw: MungeSumstats Bioconductor Hi Alan, The specs of the Linux servers have not changed. However we've recently observed some

Re: [Bioc-devel] Fw: MungeSumstats Bioconductor

2024-02-06 Thread Hervé Pagès
Hi Alan, The specs of the Linux servers have not changed. However we've recently observed some of these random kills by the Linux kernel for a couple of other packages, and we started an application to get funding to increase the amount of RAM on these machines. These random kills are a

[Bioc-devel] Fw: MungeSumstats Bioconductor

2024-02-02 Thread alan murphy
Hi, I'm the maintainer of the MungeSumstats package which is currently failing on the devel nebbiolo1 Linux platform because of RAM requirements of the unit tests. These tests use large reference datasets (like BSgenome.Hsapiens.1000genomes.hs37d5::BSgenome.Hsapiens.1000genomes.hs37d5) which