Dear Kasper and Hervé,
Thank you for your feedback and apologies for reviving such an old thread.
Hervé, you are right, apologies for the confusion in the message title and
content, it is a software package for creating/retrieving specific
annotation elements and not an annotation package.
After
>From your description it very much sounds like creating a new package is
the way to go.
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 3:03 PM Pages, Herve wrote:
> Hi Panagiotis,
>
> Avoiding code repetition is always a good idea. An alternative to the
> creation of a 3rd package would be to have one of the 2
Hi Panagiotis,
Avoiding code repetition is always a good idea. An alternative to the
creation of a 3rd package would be to have one of the 2 packages depend
on the other. If that is not a good option (and there might be some
valid reasons for that) then yes, factorizing out the repeated stuff
Dear developers,
I maintain two packages (metaseqR, recoup) and about to submit an enhanced
(but different in many points, thus a new package) version of the 1st
(metaseqR2). During their course of development, maintenance and usage,
these packages have somehow come to use a common underlying
