Good day,
Thank you for the detailed explanation. It is not a problem for me, since my
code didn't depend on the ordering of returned values, but it is a noticeable
change in the way the function works that wasn't described in the NEWS file,
which surprised me.
om previously, is there an underlying problem?
Martin
From: Bioc-devel [bioc-devel-boun...@r-project.org] on behalf of Dario Strbenac
[dstr7...@uni.sydney.edu.au]
Sent: Sunday, December 27, 2015 7:00 PM
To: bioc-devel list
Subject: [Bioc-devel] Progress
- Original Message -
> From: "Dario Strbenac"
> To: "bioc-devel"
> Sent: Sunday, December 27, 2015 4:00:10 PM
> Subject: [Bioc-devel] Progress Message Order in bplapply
> Hello,
>
> I am experiencing some new and unexpected behaviour of mcl
Hello,
I am experiencing some new and unexpected behaviour of mclapply.
Previously, progress messages were displayed in almost the expected order. Now,
they are unlike the original order. My test case is :
bplapply(1:100, function(x) {if(x %% 10 == 0) message(x); Sys.sleep(30)},
BPPARAM = Mult
