Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] Use and Usability metrics / shields
Is it ok if we use the Bioconductor shields elsewhere? For example,
in
a github repo landing page or in our website listing the software
we've contributed to.
In particular, I'm thinking of adding
http://www.bioconductor.org
- Original Message -
From: Leonardo Collado Torres lcoll...@jhu.edu
To: Dan Tenenbaum dtene...@fredhutch.org
Cc: bioc-devel@r-project.org
Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 11:43:09 AM
Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] Use and Usability metrics / shields
Awesome!
Here's the code in case
...@fredhutch.org
Cc: bioc-devel@r-project.org
Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 11:43:09 AM
Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] Use and Usability metrics / shields
Awesome!
Here's the code in case others want to add the shields to their
github
readme files.
https://gist.github.com/lcolladotor
...@fredhutch.org
Cc: Jim Hester james.f.hes...@gmail.com, bioc-devel@r-project.org
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 12:37:18 PM
Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] Use and Usability metrics / shields
Regarding the 'posts' tag, I can see that it includes a closed
questions component. For example,
http
- Original Message -
From: Leonardo Collado Torres lcoll...@jhu.edu
To: Dan Tenenbaum dtene...@fredhutch.org
Cc: bioc-devel@r-project.org
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2015 9:26:13 PM
Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] Use and Usability metrics / shields
Is it ok if we use the Bioconductor
, 2015 7:53:03 AM
Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] Use and Usability metrics / shields
The common shield convention is to use blue or orange when the
information
is not qualitatively good or bad, but the color choice is just
subjective
in the end.
It does seem though that we should indicate
- Original Message -
From: Leonardo Collado Torres lcoll...@jhu.edu
To: Dan Tenenbaum dtene...@fredhutch.org
Cc: Jim Hester james.f.hes...@gmail.com, bioc-devel@r-project.org
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 12:37:18 PM
Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] Use and Usability metrics / shields
De : Bioc-devel [bioc-devel-boun...@r-project.org] de la part de
Wolfgang Huber [whu...@embl.de]
Date d'envoi : samedi 9 mai 2015 19:57
À : Martin Morgan
Cc: bioc-devel@r-project.org
Objet : Re: [Bioc-devel] Use and Usability metrics / shields
Dear Martin
great idea.
Current
- Original Message -
From: Wolfgang Huber whu...@embl.de
To: Dan Tenenbaum dtene...@fredhutch.org
Cc: bioc-devel@r-project.org
Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2015 4:03:54 AM
Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] Use and Usability metrics / shields
Can it be that the “in Bioc” shield
]
Date d'envoi : samedi 9 mai 2015 19:57
À : Martin Morgan
Cc: bioc-devel@r-project.org
Objet : Re: [Bioc-devel] Use and Usability metrics / shields
Dear Martin
great idea.
Current build status” could perhaps be wrapped with Cross-platform
availability” into some sort of “Availability
- Original Message -
From: Jim Hester james.f.hes...@gmail.com
To: Martin Morgan mtmor...@fredhutch.org
Cc: bioc-devel@r-project.org
Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2015 7:53:03 AM
Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] Use and Usability metrics / shields
The common shield convention is to use blue
19:57
À : Martin Morgan
Cc: bioc-devel@r-project.org
Objet : Re: [Bioc-devel] Use and Usability metrics / shields
Dear Martin
great idea.
Current build status” could perhaps be wrapped with
Cross-platform availability” into some sort of “Availability /
Accessibility”?
I wonder how
- Original Message -
From: Martin Morgan mtmor...@fredhutch.org
To: bioc-devel@r-project.org
Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2015 10:15:13 AM
Subject: [Bioc-devel] Use and Usability metrics / shields
Bioc developers!
It's important that our users be able to identify packages
: Bioc-devel [bioc-devel-boun...@r-project.org] de la part de Wolfgang
Huber [whu...@embl.de]
Date d'envoi : samedi 9 mai 2015 19:57
À : Martin Morgan
Cc: bioc-devel@r-project.org
Objet : Re: [Bioc-devel] Use and Usability metrics / shields
Dear Martin
great idea.
Current build status” could
]
Date d'envoi : samedi 9 mai 2015 19:57
À : Martin Morgan
Cc: bioc-devel@r-project.org
Objet : Re: [Bioc-devel] Use and Usability metrics / shields
Dear Martin
great idea.
Current build status” could perhaps be wrapped with Cross-platform
availability” into some sort of “Availability
Dear Martin
great idea.
Current build status” could perhaps be wrapped with Cross-platform
availability” into some sort of “Availability / Accessibility”?
I wonder how informative it would be to make metrics such as
(i) citations of the associated paper
(ii) full-text mentions e.g. in
16 matches
Mail list logo