Re: [Bioc-devel] plyranges group_by

Thank you Michael, In attach the example file, since I noticed you were unable to download it from gitlab. Will continue the discussion there, then :-) Aditya From: Michael Lawrence [lawrence.mich...@gene.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2019 11:45 AM To:

Re: [Bioc-devel] plyranges group_by

I replied on the support site. Let's move the discussion there. On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 1:24 AM Bhagwat, Aditya < aditya.bhag...@mpi-bn.mpg.de> wrote: > Thank you Stuart and Michael for your feedback. > > Stuart, in response to your request for more context regarding my use > case, I have

Re: [Bioc-devel] plyranges group_by

Thank you Stuart and Michael for your feedback. Stuart, in response to your request for more context regarding my use case, I have updated my recent BioC support post, now providing all use-case details. Michael, I didn't selfmatch yet, but Stuart's

Re: [Bioc-devel] plyranges group_by

Currently, the way grouping indices are generated is pretty slow if you’re doing stuff rowwise. Michael’s suggestion for using selfmatch should speed things up a bit. What are you planning to do after grouping? I’ve found there’s usually to do stuff without rowwise grouping but really depends

Re: [Bioc-devel] plyranges group_by

Just a note that in this particular case, selfmatch(annotatedsrf) would be a fast way to generate a grouping vector, like plyranges::group_by(annotatedsrf, selfmatch(annotatedsrf)). Michael On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 2:48 AM Bhagwat, Aditya < aditya.bhag...@mpi-bn.mpg.de> wrote: > Hi Stuart,

[Bioc-devel] plyranges group_by

Hi Stuart, Michael, Your plyranges package is really cool - now I am using it for left joining GRanges (I am facing a minor issue there, but that is not the topic of this email - I have been asked by Lori not to double-post :-)). This email is about