RE: [Biojava-l] RE: clustalw-C to Java

2003-01-12 Thread Francois Pepin
I'd suggest a slight modification: use String instead of char[]. It's the usual way to handle strings and you don't have to worry about references and making a copy of the array, because Strings are immutable (they never change so no need to make another copy). François -Original Message---

RE: [Biojava-l] RE: clustalw-C to Java

2003-01-12 Thread Francois Pepin
I'd suggest a slight modification: use String instead of char[]. It's the usual way to handle strings and you don't have to worry about references and making a copy of the array, because Strings are immutable (they never change so no need to make another copy). François -Original Message---

[Biojava-l] RE: clustalw-C to Java

2003-01-12 Thread Russell Smithies
I guess lots of people will answer this so I hope I get it right :-) This isn't the exact answer but I hope it helps. structs in C can be thought of class objects in Java (done the hard way) so your tree node becomes: class Stree implements Comparable{ Stree left = null; Stree right = null;

[Biojava-l] clustalw-C to Java

2003-01-12 Thread suyee
can anybody teach me how to convert this (in C) into Java. this is taken from ClustalW1.8.1 typedef struct node { /* phylogenetic tree structure */ struct node *left; struct node *right; struct node *parent; float dist; sint leaf; int orde