On 12 Mar 2004, at 12:03, David Huen wrote:
On Friday 12 Mar 2004 11:17 am, Matthew Pocock wrote:
Hi,
The parser shouldn't be throwing a NPE. However, the NCBI blast xml
output didn't used to be well-formed XML, so was not parseable by any
XML parser. I don't know if this has since been fixed by
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Matthew Pocock wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The parser shouldn't be throwing a NPE. However, the NCBI blast xml
> output didn't used to be well-formed XML, so was not parseable by any
> XML parser. I don't know if this has since been fixed by the NCBI.
!
I have a perl module to 'cl
On Friday 12 Mar 2004 11:17 am, Matthew Pocock wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The parser shouldn't be throwing a NPE. However, the NCBI blast xml
> output didn't used to be well-formed XML, so was not parseable by any
> XML parser. I don't know if this has since been fixed by the NCBI.
>
In this case, that's not
Hi,
The parser shouldn't be throwing a NPE. However, the NCBI blast xml
output didn't used to be well-formed XML, so was not parseable by any
XML parser. I don't know if this has since been fixed by the NCBI.
Matthew
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was wondering if anyone has successfully gotten
B
On 12 Mar 2004, at 06:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When you call the train() method of the BaumWelchTrainer you supply it
with a SequenceDB. The sequences from this DB are used to optimize the
weights of the model.
However, I have a bad feeling that when you train your model with the
BaumWelchTrai
I agree.
If the BaumWelch trainer does cause problems one could always implement a
different version of ModelTrainer.
- Mark
Dan Bolser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
03/12/2004 04:47 PM
To: Mark Schreiber/GP/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Biojava Mailing List <[E
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> When you call the train() method of the BaumWelchTrainer you supply it
> with a SequenceDB. The sequences from this DB are used to optimize the
> weights of the model.
>
> However, I have a bad feeling that when you train your model with the
> Bau
