Patrick McConnell
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Biojava-l] BioJava discussion board
Does agave allow you to push annotations arround without the sequence?
In a web service environment we may not want to push the dna for chrom I
arround even though we may w
Patrick McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Biojava-l] BioJava discussion board
> I am quite happy to see web services being applied.
Do you know the other web services for biology?
We receive Web services of other sites and open the WSDL.
> Do
.org on 08/28/2002
> 01:47:53 AM
>
> Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To:Brian Gilman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> cc:Thomas Down <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Subject:Re: [Biojava-l] BioJava discussion board
>
> Hello all,
>
> >
See below...
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Down [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 5:56 AM
> To: Brian Gilman
> Cc: Thomas Down; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Biojava-l] BioJava discussion board
>
> Hi Brian
>
> On W
2002 8:48 a.m.
> To: Thomas Down
> Cc: Brian Gilman; Patrick McConnell; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Biojava-l] BioJava discussion board
>
>
> Does agave allow you to push annotations arround without the
> sequence?
> In a web service environment we may not want to push th
Does agave allow you to push annotations arround without the sequence?
In a web service environment we may not want to push the dna for chrom I
arround even though we may want to know all features within a region of
it. I am format agnostic. The important things are that:
a) any format can pot
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 09:35:59AM -0400, Brian Gilman wrote:
> I agree with Patrick on that one. Perhaps Agave could be used as the
> serialzation layer here?? It would be a little bit of work to get
> everything munged into Agave or BSML but think about the benefits for we
> poor middleware guys
> -Patrick
>
>
>
>
>
> Thomas Down <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@biojava.org on 08/28/2002 05:55:42 AM
>
> Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> To:Brian Gilman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> cc: Thomas Down <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@biojava.org on 08/28/2002 05:55:42 AM
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:Brian Gilman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:Thomas Down <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: [Biojava-l] BioJava discussion board
Hi Brian
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 12
002
01:47:53 AM
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:Brian Gilman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:Thomas Down <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Biojava-l] BioJava discussion board
Hello all,
> I'd like to see more services built with biojava. Thin
Hi Brian
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 12:09:05AM -0400, Brian Gilman wrote:
>
> BioJava does not work well in a distributed environment in terms
> of RMI calls or in the "weservices" stack. Custom
> serializers/deserializers need to be made for each and every object that
> exists in the feature
Hello all,
> I'd like to see more services built with biojava. Things like
> performing SSAHA as an RPC/SOAP call would be nice. A deployable app that
> had an installer and set itself up as an "alignment service" would be
> greatI think we could contribute some code to this endeavor.
Hello Thomas,
I'd be interested in this. You've asked me for a gripes list about
BioJava in general. I'm still thinking about this but, some things that
come to mind are:
BioJava does not work well in a distributed environment in terms
of RMI calls or in the "weservices" stack. C
Hi...
This is something of a new departure for BioJava, but a couple
of us on the BioJava IRC channel (#biojava on irc.openprojects.
net) were wondering if there would be interest in some kind
of discussion board for biojava developers.
Web boards have been fairly successful discussion media in
14 matches
Mail list logo
