the effort, in
both documentation/rewriting code and difficulty understanding the system.
Greg
-Original Message-
From: Mark Schreiber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 6:05 PM
To: Thomas Down
Cc: biojava-l (E-mail)
Subject: Re: [Biojava-l] ChangeVetoExceptions
This see
Hi -
I generally agree that checked exceptions are safer and for throw away
programs I tend to catch exceptions and throw errors but I have recently
read a number of articles (mostly in java world) that have called into
question the "design flaw" of enforced exception handling.
According to thes
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 09:52:38AM +1200, Schreiber, Mark wrote:
>
> Hi -
>
> I was wondering if it might be better if ChangeVetoException could be
> subclassed from an unchecked exception.
>
> I know that unchecked exceptions are a contentious issue in java but in many
> cases when writing a s
Hi -
I was wondering if it might be better if ChangeVetoException could be
subclassed from an unchecked exception.
I know that unchecked exceptions are a contentious issue in java but in many
cases when writing a simple program I want to add a feature to an internal
feature holder or a sequence
