]
> Subject: RE: [Biojava-l] New look for BJIA
> To: "Richard HOLLAND" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Message-ID:
>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> I thought abou
k you.
-
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, July 04, 2005 11:18 AM
> To: Richard HOLLAND
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Biojava-l] New look for BJIA
>
>
> I thought abou
CTED]
07/04/2005 11:11 AM
To: Mark Schreiber/GP/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Biojava-l] New look for BJIA
I'd prefer it without line numbers as I do a lot of cut-and-pasting. Maybe
there is some way of adding them without get
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Biojava-l] New look for BJIA
>
>
> The problem I have with the L&F of the BioJava site is that
> the 'side bar'
> appears to be hard coded into the pages. This was bad enough
> when I tried
> to update recently and had to
e the examples into your IDE or Emacs/Vi. Should I keep
numbers or drop them?
- Mark
Sylvain Foisy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
07/01/2005 11:04 PM
To:
cc: (bcc: Mark Schreiber/GP/Novartis)
Subject: [Biojava-l] New look for BJIA
HI Mark,
How about the L&F of the Biojava site? I ported the french version some time
ago and I do have some of the english pages ported too. If there is a
volunteer to help me out, I could finish this by end of July.
Best regards
Sylvain
=
On Jul 1, 2005, at 4:21 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It looks reasonable on Firefox and IE5. Please let me know if it is
unreadable on other browsers.
Looks good on Safari (Mac OS X) too. I can highly recommend to add a
doctype line at the top of the html document to tell the browsers which
Hello -
I'm experimenting with a new style sheet for biojava in anger. Currently
the home page (http://www.biojava.org/docs/bj_in_anger/index.htm) and one
example use the style sheet
(http://www.biojava.org/docs/bj_in_anger/blastecho.htm). The look of the
main page is essentially the same (but
