Re: [Biojava-l] Re: BioSQL implementation bugs

2002-03-09 Thread Thomas Down
On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 11:57:28AM +, Keith James wrote: > > I've also successfully populated an instance using Postgres. There > does appear to be a bug somewhere in retrieving Sequence objects as an > EMBL dump that I tried had a bunch of blank lines where each Location > should have been (

Re: [Biojava-l] Re: BioSQL implementation bugs

2002-03-09 Thread David Huen
On 9 Mar 2002, Keith James wrote: > > (on a more +ve note, I've got rid of almost all the Javadoc errors > throw up by the new 1.4 Javadoc) > You're a star! Regards, David Huen ___ Biojava-l mailing list - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://biojava.org/mail

Re: [Biojava-l] Re: BioSQL implementation bugs

2002-03-09 Thread Keith James
I've also successfully populated an instance using Postgres. There does appear to be a bug somewhere in retrieving Sequence objects as an EMBL dump that I tried had a bunch of blank lines where each Location should have been (and the LocationFormatter tests all pass). Sorry I can't be more speci

[Biojava-l] Re: BioSQL implementation bugs

2002-03-08 Thread Thomas Down
On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 01:40:18PM -0500, Simon Foote wrote: > I've been messing with the BioSQL implementation and have found a couple > of bugs. Both are the result of the term_name in the ontology_term > table being a fixed length char (255). > > 1) The feature.byType() method gives the 25