Re: [Biojava-l] RefSeq bioJava parser problem

2002-05-14 Thread Matthew Pocock
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > > Appreciate the responses to the refSeq question. We've been able to put togther > a reliable parser using the example in TestRefSeqPrt. Great! Would you be interested in contributing this to BioJava once you are happy with it? > > Have an additional question

Re: [Biojava-l] RefSeq bioJava parser problem

2002-05-14 Thread Matthew Pocock
. > Good luck > > Greg > > > >>-Original Message- >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 11:41 AM >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: [Biojava-l] RefSeq bioJava parser problem >> >&g

RE: [Biojava-l] RefSeq bioJava parser problem

2002-05-14 Thread Cox, Greg
nal Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 11:41 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Biojava-l] RefSeq bioJava parser problem > > > Hi, > > Appreciate the responses to the refSeq question. We've been > ab

[Biojava-l] RefSeq bioJava parser problem

2002-05-14 Thread wanner . de
direction. Greg > -Original Message- > From: Matthew Pocock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 8:58 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Biojava-l] RefSeq bioJava parser problem > > > Hi, > > The genbank pa