I've had a look of the schema and it does seem very reminiscent of
EMBL/Genbank files in the type of features it captures and the general way
they are laid out.
I think it is also possible to graft on hierarchical features onto this
schema in the manner Thomas indicated - use a separate table to
On Mon, 30 Jul 2001, Thomas Down wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 01:48:57PM +0100, Ewan Birney wrote:
> >
>
> David, have you looked at the BPDB schema? How welll do you
> think it meets your needs?
>
I haven't looked at the BPDB schema yet, I'll try to do that this evening.
To save me naviga
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 01:48:57PM +0100, Ewan Birney wrote:
>
> > in BioJava. For instance, a Java-centric schema could get
> > away with tricks like serializing any datatypes it didn't
> > explicitly understand (I'm thinking particularly of
> > Annotation-bundle data here). That sort of thing
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 12:02:11PM +0100, Ewan Birney wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jul 2001, David Huen wrote:
>
> > a) choice of DB
> > I've made a start on implementing the above and using Postgresql
> > for the purpose as it appears to be the only "free" database with
> > transactions implemented. I f
Hi,
> I've made a start on implementing the above and using Postgresql
> for the purpose as it appears to be the only "free" database with
> transactions implemented. I figure we will want transactions as we will
> either want the sequences/features completely instantiated or not at all.
Later
a) choice of DB
I've made a start on implementing the above and using Postgresql
for the purpose as it appears to be the only "free" database with
transactions implemented. I figure we will want transactions as we will
either want the sequences/features completely instantiated or not at all.
The
