[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Appreciate the responses to the refSeq question. We've been able to put togther
> a reliable parser using the example in TestRefSeqPrt.
Great! Would you be interested in contributing this to BioJava once you
are happy with it?
>
> Have an additional question
Hi.
Anyone that write parsers should take a look at the
org.biojava.bio.program.tagvalue package. It has cleaner support for
this kind of parsing problem. We should be able to refactor sequenceIO
to re-use a lot of this API, giving a much more modular framework for
handeling nasty things like
Unfortunately, not. This is probably the weakest point in BioJava's parsing
right now.
As you may have noticed, there's a more serious problem with the reference
information. If a reference doesn't contain a field that others do, nothing
is added under that key, causing them to get out of syn
