On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 01:20:41AM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > Or if you means case like: Router A having two interfaces (with IP1 and
> > IP2) connected to the same network N, router B also connected to
> > network N may use multihop to IP1 and IP2 for routes that goes through
> > router A
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 01:22:48AM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > For PTP iface, the list contains at most one entry (so the scan is fast
> > :-) ) and you have to examine it anyways to know neighbor's IP address.
>
> Yes, it is a small improvement I guess and you would find the remote
> IP ad
Ondrej Zajicek wrote on 2010/12/21 01:13:10:
>
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 12:35:17AM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > I meant a #define OSPF_IT_MPTP xx so one knows
> > if it is a ptmp and ptp link.
>
> It would need more work to really support PTMP, as there
> are places where it is assumed that
Ondrej Zajicek wrote on 2010/12/21 00:59:18:
>
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 02:36:50PM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > Question:
> >
> > in calc_next_hop() does this* match
> > 16.1.1 para 5. ...the parent vertex is a network that
> > directly connects the calculating router to the destination
>
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 09:55:24AM +0100, Matthias Schiffer wrote:
> Hi,
> the attached patch adds support for using link-local v6 addresses for
> BGP peerings by adding an interface attribute to the BGP protocol.
> It has been succesfully tested in a Bird<->Quagga configuration on
> Linux, and wit
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 12:35:17AM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> I meant a #define OSPF_IT_MPTP xx so one knows
> if it is a ptmp and ptp link.
It would need more work to really support PTMP, as there
are places where it is assumed that neighbor list for
PTP iface contains at most one entry.
>
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 02:36:50PM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> Question:
>
> in calc_next_hop() does this* match
> 16.1.1 para 5. ...the parent vertex is a network that
> directly connects the calculating router to the destination
> router. The list of next hops is then determined by
> e
Ondrej Zajicek wrote on 2010/12/21 00:40:50:
>
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 12:25:49AM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > Perhaps you can add PTP IF type too?
>
> PTP is supported, do you mean PTMP?
I meant a #define OSPF_IT_MPTP xx so one knows
if it is a ptmp and ptp link. For ptp links you don't
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 12:25:49AM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> Perhaps you can add PTP IF type too?
PTP is supported, do you mean PTMP?
--
Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo
Ondrej 'SanTiago' Zajicek (email: santi...@crfreenet.org)
OpenPGP encrypted e-mails preferred (KeyID 0x11DEADC3, wwwkeys.p
Ondrej Zajicek wrote on 2010/12/21 00:27:44:
>
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 02:02:07PM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > >
> > > Something like this. It is not tested at all and and very simple.
> >
> > Here is version 2, even simpler :)
>
> That is nice, makes several things simpler. I will merge t
Ondrej Zajicek wrote on 2010/12/21 00:22:26:
>
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 09:03:01AM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > I don't remember all the details anymore but sharing IP address for numbered
> > ptp I/Fs is not pathological.
>
> Having two independent networks with the same IP prefix seems pr
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 02:02:07PM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> >
> > Something like this. It is not tested at all and and very simple.
>
> Here is version 2, even simpler :)
That is nice, makes several things simpler. I will merge that,
with some minor modifications.
--
Elen sila lumenn' o
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 09:03:01AM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> I don't remember all the details anymore but sharing IP address for numbered
> ptp I/Fs is not pathological.
Having two independent networks with the same IP prefix seems pretty
pathological to me.
> It should just work. Also any
Le 19/12/2010 08:44, Nick a écrit :
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 09:06:16AM -0300, Andrew Latham wrote:
Sorry, I am a bit of a lurker on this list but I must chime in. In
the last 15 years I have watched many projects grow and let me say
that community documentation is a good step. It is hard and c
On 17.12.2010 11:52, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 10:54:14PM +0100, Maciej Drobniuch wrote:
>> Hi All !
>> This is most likely a question to Ondrej.
>> Could You create a wiki subdomain/directory so we could act like a
>> community and create simple descriptions/manuals/howto ?
>
15 matches
Mail list logo
