Re: Not re-exporting learned OSPF routes

2013-06-18 Thread Ondrej Zajicek
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 02:41:12PM -0400, Ryan Whelan wrote: Wow- thanks for the quick response guys! This works great! Is it possible to set the dead timer, auth ttype, password, etc per area and only override the interface differences (like cost) on a per interface basis? (having the

Re: Not re-exporting learned OSPF routes

2013-06-18 Thread Ryan Whelan
That would be helpful- it'd be nice to not have to keep the same setting in multiple places in the config file On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 4:50 AM, Ondrej Zajicek santi...@crfreenet.orgwrote: On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 02:41:12PM -0400, Ryan Whelan wrote: Wow- thanks for the quick response guys!

Re: RIPng advertisement hop count 1 (should be 255 per RFC)

2013-06-18 Thread Simon Dickhoven
Hi, again If you were paying attention (unlike myself) you may have noticed that the below fix doesn't actually make BIRD RFC-compliant. Rather, it makes BIRD interoperate with other RFC-compliant RIPng routers. After all, the RFC doesn't state that route advertisements must be sent with an

Propagating /32 from OSPF to BGP

2013-06-18 Thread Michael Ludvig
Hi we've got a private AS with two uplinks to our ISP, and we've got a number of subnets that we advertise. Now we got a new assignment and it doesn't work as expected. Here is the situation: x.x.74.113 x.x.74.114 [DMZ1_box_1] || [DMZ1_GW] -- OSPF -- [GW_1] -- OSPF -- [GW_2] -- OSPF -- ...

Re: Propagating /32 from OSPF to BGP

2013-06-18 Thread Simon Dickhoven
A more detailed topology (with IPs and interface names) would be helpful to understand the setup better. Is it possible that your ISP is accepting le 32 on their BGP session with GW_2 (and that's the one they checked when you asked them to verify) but only le 31 on their BGP session with