On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 02:19:05PM +0100, Wolfgang Hennerbichler wrote:
Fellow Bird Users,
Now I realized that if I changed the definition for 'allnet' and do a
'configure soft' these routes that are added or removed to 'allnet' are
not rejected or added, because it seems that there is no
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 08:06:31PM +0100, Martin Kraus wrote:
Hi.
I'd like to ask what is the state of ipv6 in bird. I know it doesn't support
OSPFv3 but last time I tried, ipv6 RIP didn't work either. Has something
changed
or do I have to use a different routing daemon for ipv6?
OSPFv3
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 04:03:32PM +0100, Wolfgang Hennerbichler wrote:
- per protocol request for route refresh
hm. I'm not exactly sure how you mean this - something like:
bird restart protocol R1234 soft
Yes.
like
bird configure route-refresh
= i'd prefer the per protocol thing
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 03:45:49PM +, openbsd misc wrote:
I had a script generate some filters and add them to the very end of
bird.conf (latest version 1.1.6) and if I do a birdc - configure
it complains no such filter. If move the filters above the bgp
protocol section they are found
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 12:54:15AM +0100, KORN Andras wrote:
Hi,
we have a 5Mbps symmetric microwave uplink with one static IP and a /30
subnet. We're contemplating getting an additional ADSL connection to serve
as backup. If the ISP cooperates, is there a way for me to load-balance and
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 06:41:15PM +0300, Mikhail A. Grishin wrote:
Hi,
Another one question regarding looking glass output.
Is it possible to show current prefix count in 'show protocols' output?
Right now, if we want to collect prefix counters, we need to apply 'show
route protocol
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 05:19:09PM +0800, Affandi INDRAJI wrote:
Hi Ondrej,
Thanks for prompt reply.
A couple of question:
1. How to configure based on match AS for example in cisco, they have
regular expression like _7898$, what is the equivalent of this command
in BIRD config file (do
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 03:15:14PM +0300, Mikhail A. Grishin wrote:
Yes, we had some filters on pipes for every client.
Upon your explanation, we transfered filters from pipes to the protocol
bgp section of the config.
Now show protocols all output shows all needed information.
Just a note
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 12:54:03PM +0300, Mikhail A. Grishin wrote:
First of all, thank you for patch and for fast respond!
After applying both patches (date patch and well-known communities) on
production server, we got some strange errors:
Jan 28 12:02:04 msk-rsm2 bird: R34485x1: Error:
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 12:47:47PM +, Andy Davidson wrote:
On 14/01/2010 10:19, Ondrej Filip wrote:
[Upon announcing 1.2.0]
o Implements MRTdump - binary logging protocol compatible with other
routing daemons. Only BGP part of MRTdump is yet implemented.
Is any body using this
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 09:06:29PM +0100, Arnold Nipper wrote:
On 10.03.2010 20:57 Arnold Nipper wrote
Where to put the core and the binary?
Unfortunately both bird as well as bird6 dump to core. Is there any way
to have them dump to something like
core{4,6}-mmmddHHMMSS
The
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 01:57:36PM +0200, Vitaliy Kolodinsky wrote:
Dear, bird-us...@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz.
Who has a working BIRD 1.2.1 ospf md5 authentication and Cisco?
---Log File--
Mar 16 17:34:52 vulture2 bird: MyOSPF: OSPF_auth: size mismatch (88 vs 124)
Mar 16 17:34:52
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 04:15:27PM +0159, Vitaliy Kolodinsky wrote:
Dear, Ondrej Zajicek.
?? ?? 19 ? 2010 ?., 16:05:04:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 01:57:36PM +0200, Vitaliy Kolodinsky wrote:
Dear, bird-us...@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz.
Who has a working BIRD 1.2.1 ospf md5
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 05:52:04PM +0159, Vitaliy Kolodinsky wrote:
Hmm, it seems that Cisco just sends some trash after the end of OSPF packet.
Perhaps it would suffice to remove the check in BIRD, but i personally
don't test this compatibility.
In area 0.0.0.2 works some Cisco routers,
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 03:33:09PM +0100, Ondrej Filip wrote:
On 22.3.2010 15:29, Martin Mares wrote:
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 08:41:16AM +0100, Wolfgang Hennerbichler wrote:
Good Morning Ondrej Ondrej,
would it be possible to let bird6 log with the bird6 prefix to syslog
instead of
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 12:23:53AM +0100, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
2) You probably don't want 'export all' to protocol ospf.
That would lead to export routes from direct protocol to ospf protocol,
whis is not what you want (protocol ospf generates routes for connected
devices itself so
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 10:19:59PM +0100, David J Craigon wrote:
Hello,
Here's what I want to do. I've got bird running BGP to two transit
network providers. I want my path selection to be like this:
1) Choose the shortest AS path.
2) If the AS path is equal in length, prioritise one
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 07:28:18PM -0600, Neil Davidson wrote:
Working with a new BIRD 1.2.1 build and am trying to get route
reflection set up. I cannot get BIRD to accept the rr cluster id
command. I get the following error message ...
Hello
This is known bug, you can use attached patch or
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 02:44:11PM +0200, Wolfgang Hennerbichler wrote:
Allright, reply to myself:
This seems to be a bug in BIRD.
What I actually added was a rule that certain communities should be deleted:
if ((1120,1)) ~ bgp_community then bgp_community.delete((1120,1));
this
On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 10:22:05AM +0200, Wolfgang Hennerbichler wrote:
Hi Ondrejs,
I think I found another bug. For some mysterious reason our system time
jumped forward (more than 30.000 seconds) on one of our route-servers. I
don't know why this happened, but I suspect a broken ntp
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 07:09:17PM +0200, Ondrej Filip wrote:
Yes, would replacing direct { } with
static {
route 0.0.0.0/0 via 84.45.39.149;
route 91.203.56.0/23 via eth0;
}
be more idiomatic here?
The second route has one side-effect - it is exported to the
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 12:39:07PM +0200, Stefan Jakob wrote:
Am 16.04.2010 12:21, schrieb Stefan Jakob:
ird show protocol R123
name prototablestate since info
R123 BGP Ttablename start 2010-04-16 09:36:35 Idle
Socket: Broken pipe
restart R123
removed the
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 01:08:31AM +0200, Arnold Nipper wrote:
Version 1.2.2 (2010-04-10)
o Many bugfixes in BGP, OSPF, filters, ...
does this include the timestamp fix?
Yes.
--
Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo
Ondrej 'SanTiago' Zajicek (email: santi...@crfreenet.org)
OpenPGP encrypted
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 09:41:47AM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
I am using Quagga ATM but I had a quick look at BIRD and I got a few
observations.
Hello. Thank you for your tips and notes.
The LSA/checksum code seem very inefficient.
LSAs are built allocating/reallocing bits
of memory.
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 08:27:40AM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Yes, but not at the moment. The endian problem should be addressed when you
build the lsa.
Does this help at all? In any case, the (int) cast should be there.
Removing of endianity swap is correct only if the Fletcher
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 01:06:20PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
I must be missing something then(not surprising as I just started looking
at BIRD). Why do you need the separate allocation for the body of the LSA
then?
Why not just adding entries to the allocated LSA header?
Ahh, I am
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 04:12:27PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
As i looked on the Fletcher checksum, it seems that you cannot just swap
the result instead of swapping the checked data.
Then there is a bug else where. Fletcher as such does not
depend on host endian. It operates on bytes
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 05:29:09PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
But you also need LSAs in host endianity when doing SPF calculation.
Although it would be probably possible to change SPF calculation to
use directly BE values it would be huge work and it is questionable
whether it wouldn't
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 07:40:28PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
So there isn't really difference in performance of both
implementations. Even on slow embedded AMD Geode CPU, it gives
~ 180 MB/s.
No difference? what does 1.2 mean? to me this means 20% which is a lot
Yes,
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 07:40:28PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Martin Mares m...@ucw.cz wrote on 2010/04/23 19:23:18:
Hello!
So there isn't really difference in performance of both
implementations. Even on slow embedded AMD Geode CPU, it gives
~ 180 MB/s.
No
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 06:08:04PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
This is not a problem because both SPF and calc_next_hop() chooses the
cheapest (full) ptp link. They both uses the same (local) metrics.
Our ptp links typically have the same cost between the same two routers so
it is not
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 11:41:17AM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Here are a series of performance improvements on the
Internet checksum. With these changes applied I get about
20-30% better performance on x86 and PowerPC.
Although i agree with Martin Mares that such kind of optimizations
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 06:13:58PM -, Rob Epping wrote:
Hi list,
Today I spend a lot of time debugging why BIRD doesn't get our
IPSO VRRP cluster in 2WAY state, while junos and IOS routers do.
...
Both IPSO routers send OSPF messages with RID .3, see below.
...
My guess is that
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 01:04:44AM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
BIRD does not use link availability information, therefore if you pull
the cable, BIRD keeps the whole subnet in the router-LSA (if it is
a stub network).
If you do(any plans?), my vote is to leave a host stub in the R-LSA
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 01:57:29AM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Ah, now I think I know. The while(buf end) is optimized for
post inc so that is why.
tested little and was surprised, only 3-5% slower with the while loop
compared to my for loop, it is mainly the post increment that does
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 10:31:18AM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
I missed this patch. Shouldn't autoconf also set linker
binary name to some variable (for crosscompiling)?
You would think that, but you need libtool for that. It is better
not to use LD directly if you can avoid it.
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 04:39:37PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
I think I mentioned this in passing but the fletcher checksum impl.
is fragile. Try changing u16 length to u32 length and watch it
break for no apparent reason.
Yes, i noticed that and will fix that. Thanks.
You know
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 10:58:39PM +0200, Martin Mares wrote:
(BTW where we rely on GCC?)
There are several frequent GCCisms in the code, like
'struct abc b = {field: 123}', '? :' or ({ ... }).
--
Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo
Ondrej 'SanTiago' Zajicek (email: santi...@crfreenet.org)
OpenPGP
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 09:07:29AM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
While we are in cf-lex.l, this looks like a bug:
-0x{DIGIT}+ {
+0x{XIGIT}+ {
Definitely, thank you. I will merge that bugfix.
--
Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo
Ondrej 'SanTiago' Zajicek (email: santi...@crfreenet.org)
OpenPGP
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 02:26:51PM +0200, Arjan Filius wrote:
Hello,
Hello, thanks for the bugreport.
an update.
added listen bgp v6only; in the global section of my bird6.conf seems
to solve it.
a mistery still why it kept running with exchange connection then, that
put me on the
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 01:39:25PM +0200, Martin Kraus wrote:
Hi. I have bird 1.2.2 running on debian lenny on two routers connected by a
nonbroadcast configuration.
first router has 212.71.191.77/30 on its interface, the second
212.71.191.78/30. They can't negotiate ospf and I get this in
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 05:49:21PM +0200, Martin Kraus wrote:
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 03:53:31PM +0200, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 01:39:25PM +0200, Martin Kraus wrote:
The private /25 prefixes uses private IP addresses? There was a change in
BIRD
that interface
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 04:41:12PM +0400, ? ?? wrote:
filter import_exclude_default {
if ( source = RTS_OSPF_INT net != 0.0.0.0/0 ) then {
...
what protocol has told me about this route. Possible values: RTS_DUMMY,
RTS_STATIC, RTS_INHERIT, RTS_DEVICE, RTS_STATIC_DEVICE,
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 01:19:13PM +0200, Robert Wein wrote:
Hello,
in our testing environment I experienced two strange spontaneous crashes with
bird6 1.2.3, running on debian 5.0.5 (amd64).
Thanks, fixed.
You can use the attached patch to fix the problem. It is IPv6 specific.
--
Elen
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 01:54:32PM +0400, ? ?? wrote:
Hi,
Now 'scan time' set to 60 sec. The bird load system up to 100% during 10-12
sec every 60 sec.
There is probably something broken in your setup. I have full BGP in
kernel routing table and periodic scanning took just a
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 12:04:21PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
fe...@majklik:~/src/git/bird$ patch -p1 ld.patch
patching file tools/Rules.in
That patch breaks cross compile. Please look at
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/3791
Perhaps passing -mno-relax and/or -r will do it?
On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 10:18:53AM +0200, Stéphane Bunel wrote:
Hi,
Morning at 09:54 (GMT+2)
r...@srtools:~# birdc
BIRD 1.2.4 ready.
bird show memory
BIRD memory usage
Routing tables: 12 MB
Route attributes: 4592 B
Protocols: 34 kB
Total: 12 MB
Memory
On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 02:07:43PM +0200, Peter Lieven wrote:
Hi,
i would like to hide some traffic engineering communities from bgp
advertisements to peers.
I'm using Bird 1.2.4 and from what I have read in the Changelog it should be
possible to have something
like this in an outbound
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 02:36:38PM +0200, Stéphane Bunel wrote:
Hi there,
I'm working on a use case with two routers (foundry) emiting RIPv2
messages in multicast over an ethernet link and one Ubuntu/Linux/64
server with BIRD configured as a quiet RIP listener.
Configuration is
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 07:45:15PM +0300, Alexander Shikoff wrote:
Hello,
is it possible in filter to delete all communities except ones which
are stored in pre-defined list?
It is possible to do that, but you have to manually invert the list
of communities. For example instead of a list of
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 01:50:58PM +0300, Alexander Shikoff wrote:
This code works for me.
This is a recent feature, perhaps you are using an old version of BIRD.
Try version 1.2.4 .
I'm using 1.2.4.
Where do you call a function from? In my configuration it is called from
filter:
I
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 08:50:23PM +0300, Alexander Shikoff wrote:
Hello,
I have a problem with implementing following logic:
if route has any of communities 31210:0 ... 31210:65535 then do nothing
else add community 31210:31210.
I tried next control:
if ! ( (31210,*) ~
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 08:48:50PM +0200, Timo Weingärtner wrote:
Hi,
Am Dienstag, 2. Februar 2010 schrieb Ondrej Zajicek:
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 06:57:14PM +, Chris Webb wrote:
This seems to work fine, apart from the message bird: Netlink: File
exists appearing in syslog every
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 09:56:07PM +0300, Alexander Shikoff wrote:
Hello,
I want to store prefixes in RIB with communities but I want to delete
communities when prefix is being announced to peer.
I'm trying following function:
function bgp_out (int peer_as)
{
if ! (source =
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 07:57:49PM +0300, Alexander Shikoff wrote:
There is a bug in community set delete. Try attached patch to fix it.
Thank you very much! This patch fixes a problem.
Ondrej, do you plan to implement invertion of community lists?
Not invertion of community lists, but
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 09:44:57PM +0200, Peter Lieven wrote:
i tried to run this command on bird 1.2.4
bgp_community.delete([(64960,*)]);
but i get the following error:
filters, line 4676: Can't add/delete non-pair
any hints?
Hello
See this:
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 09:16:40PM +0200, Christoph Biedl wrote:
Or should I really start bird6 as a second routing daemon to handle
the IPv6 prefixes?
Yes.
This is silly since this means duplication of the
configuration file and all the peer detection and route switching is
not
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 10:26:37PM +0200, Peter Lieven wrote:
http://www.mail-archive.com/bird-users@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/msg00681.html
And perhaps also this, but it is unrelated:
http://www.mail-archive.com/bird-users@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/msg00688.html
ok, i guess this will
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 07:16:34PM +0200, David Rohleder wrote:
It seems silly for the first moment, but it has several advantages.
IPv4 and IPv6 usually needs slightly different configs, different filters
(esp. addresses in filters) and having separate IPv4 sessions and IPv6
sessions
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 04:55:12PM +0100, Andrew Lemin wrote:
As long as multipath is implemented in the RIP protocol too, then go
for the first method as it is the proper place for it. We NEED ECMP in
RIP though. Please.. :)
The point I was trying to make is by adding the functionality to the
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 11:00:39AM -0700, Mahlon E. Smith wrote:
I'm running bird 1.2.4 on a series of FreeBSD OSPF routers.
Had a backhoe go through some fiber this morning (really), and was
surprised to find that bird didn't update routes automatically.
...
I don't see anything else to
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 07:39:48AM -0700, Mahlon E. Smith wrote:
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
BIRD currently does not check or use link up/down state. OSPF routers
generally check reachability using HELLO packets, not by reported link
state, although sometimes this is also
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 03:27:06PM +0100, Arnold Nipper wrote:
Just came across
Keepalive timer: -22205673/60
Weird, isn't it?
It is in most BGP sessions or only in a few?
--
Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo
Ondrej 'SanTiago' Zajicek (email: santi...@crfreenet.org)
OpenPGP encrypted
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 07:31:38PM +0100, Arnold Nipper wrote:
On 06.11.2010 19:26 Ondrej Zajicek wrote
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 03:27:06PM +0100, Arnold Nipper wrote:
Just came across
Keepalive timer: -22205673/60
Weird, isn't it?
It is in most BGP sessions or only
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 09:05:03AM +0100, Jaroslav Jirásek wrote:
Hi, I have this bird.conf :
This configuration makes immediate crash of bird, with this syslog message:
Nov 4 23:34:39 router user.info kernel: bird[5236]: segfault at 34 ip
0805f8d6 sp bfb262f0 error 4
Nov 4 23:34:39
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 09:05:38PM +0100, Arnold Nipper wrote:
I guess small negative values may occur. Or not?
Yes these may occur if the router is loaded.
--
Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo
Ondrej 'SanTiago' Zajicek (email: santi...@crfreenet.org)
OpenPGP encrypted e-mails preferred (KeyID
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 10:38:55AM +, Andrew Lemin wrote:
Hi all,
What does the BIRD dev team think? Is there anything more I can do to help
with adding this functionality.
Hello, currently i am finalizing link state detection for OSPF.
After that i would probably look at ECMP.
--
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 10:36:22AM +0100, Arnold Nipper wrote:
birdc show route 65.52.0.0/15
BIRD 1.2.2 ready.
IP address expected
Perhaps a probem caused by a shell? Try:
birdc show route '65.52.0.0/15'
--
Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo
Ondrej 'SanTiago' Zajicek (email:
On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 01:58:21AM +0100, Arnold Nipper wrote:
On 30.11.2010 10:49 Ondrej Zajicek wrote
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 10:36:22AM +0100, Arnold Nipper wrote:
birdc show route 65.52.0.0/15
BIRD 1.2.2 ready.
IP address expected
Perhaps a probem caused by a shell? Try
On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 10:05:10AM +, Matthew Walster wrote:
On 1 December 2010 00:58, Arnold Nipper arn...@nipper.de wrote:
birdc show route '65.52.0.0/15'
BIRD 1.2.2 ready.
IP address expected
Try:
birdc show route 65.52.0.0/15
i.e. don't use the apostrophes either side of
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 09:22:57PM +0100, Arnold Nipper wrote:
A couple of hours ago bird6 crashed. Core dump may be found at
http://download.de-cix.net/rs6-l_1292066402_bird6_11.gz
MD5sum is 9509d3ac560da9588ac36c763547227c
Could you also send me appropriate bird binary?
Arnold
btw:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 11:00:25AM +0100, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 06:03:47PM +0100, Arnold Nipper wrote:
So, what is the conclusion? This is a OS/shell problem, not a BIRD
problem. Given so, is there anyone who is able to explain, what actually
happens? I have never
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 09:22:57PM +0100, Arnold Nipper wrote:
A couple of hours ago bird6 crashed. Core dump may be found at
According to the core dump, that seems like the bug we already fixed in
v1.2.5.
--
Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo
Ondrej 'SanTiago' Zajicek (email:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 07:02:58PM +0100, Simone Morandini wrote:
Hi all,
I've just configured a new peer on our IPv6 implementation of BIRD and,
as per the subject, I'm receiving the following error with sh
protocols:
peer name BGP T_peer name start 18:05 Idle
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 02:27:31PM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
I remember we had an discussion about multiple unnumbered ptp links between
two nodes. There was a potential problem in OSPF with asymmetric routing
but the conclusion was that it would not happen as BIRD didn't support ECMP.
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 09:03:01AM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
I don't remember all the details anymore but sharing IP address for numbered
ptp I/Fs is not pathological.
Having two independent networks with the same IP prefix seems pretty
pathological to me.
It should just work. Also any
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 12:25:49AM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Perhaps you can add PTP IF type too?
PTP is supported, do you mean PTMP?
--
Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo
Ondrej 'SanTiago' Zajicek (email: santi...@crfreenet.org)
OpenPGP encrypted e-mails preferred (KeyID 0x11DEADC3,
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 09:55:24AM +0100, Matthias Schiffer wrote:
Hi,
the attached patch adds support for using link-local v6 addresses for
BGP peerings by adding an interface attribute to the BGP protocol.
It has been succesfully tested in a Bird-Quagga configuration on
Linux, and with
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 01:22:48AM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
For PTP iface, the list contains at most one entry (so the scan is fast
:-) ) and you have to examine it anyways to know neighbor's IP address.
Yes, it is a small improvement I guess and you would find the remote
IP address,
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 11:23:44PM +0200, Alexander Shikoff wrote:
Hello,
There is possible bug in calculation of expressions.
Let's assume that bgp_path.first is a 32-bit ASN.
Then this line does not work:
bgp_community.add((MyASN,bgp_path.first-bgp_path.first/65536*65536));
P.S. I'm
On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 05:03:46AM +0200, Alexander Shikoff wrote:
One possible way to do that is not to try handle full 32bit ASNs, but
perhaps just ~ 24bit ASNs and use communities (65000..65255,*) for
(65000+X,Y) - Do not announce to peer X*65536+Y and similarly
communities
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 08:06:17PM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Other packets are sent to the neighbor IP address, which is a slight
diversion from RFC 2328, but should not cause any problems.
But a stricter router may reject OSPF msg over an ptp links if
they aren't addressed
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 01:15:28AM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Other packets are sent to the neighbor IP address, which is a slight
diversion from RFC 2328, but should not cause any problems.
But a stricter router may reject OSPF msg over an ptp links if
they aren't
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 02:12:53AM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Right, some comments:
- px_pos* is redundant. Just use rt_pos* for both V4 and V6.
rt_pos* is a position in Router-LSA, px_pos* is a position in
Rt Prefix-LSA. In IPv6, we use both and they might be different.
- You can use
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:21:58PM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Ah, now I see. You took the concept one step further.
How does the lsa pos in add_network work for ac_stubnet_list?
Stubnet lists does not have en interface connected, perhaps ac_stubnet_list
isn't applicable for add_network?
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 09:30:51AM +0100, Jerome Durand wrote:
Yep, that was a copy/paste error (I tool the example from the web site)
Actually I found a workaround for which I don't need an else:
statement, and which is much better... !
Here was the faulty filter (of course replace
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 02:17:24AM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Ah, good to hear.
Any plans to add support for Opaque LSAs/GMPLS in the near future?
Nothing specific. Where (and how) is this feature used?
BTW, I think the README could use an update:
This software should be considered a
On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 05:29:08PM +0100, Arnold Nipper wrote:
It looks like BIRD logical operator is not doing a shortcut. I.e even
if you have s.th. like
if 0 $some_complex_expression then ...
if 1 || $some_complex_expression then ...
BIRD will try to evaluate
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 05:37:25PM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Any plans to add support for Opaque LSAs/GMPLS in the near future?
Nothing specific. Where (and how) is this feature used?
We have an old zebra based GMPLS TE (using RSVP too) to allocate
paths through our network. Don't
On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 11:31:36PM +0200, Aragon Gouveia wrote:
Hi,
I'm running FreeBSD 8.1 and started using Bird 1.2.5 for the first time
today, but it kept finding interfaces with garbled names, eg.
Possible patch attached. Could someone review this please?
Thanks for the patch, it is
)
To err is human -- to blame it on a computer is even more so.
commit dad7ee70c1711b2cbdfd86c615736fe12c0d126a
Author: Ondrej Zajicek santi...@crfreenet.org
Date: Sat Jan 8 11:22:38 2011 +0100
Fixes interface names on BSD systems.
diff --git a/sysdep/bsd/krt-sock.c b/sysdep/bsd/krt-sock.c
index
On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 05:34:18PM +0100, Matthias Schiffer wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that the currect git version of bird always disables a BGP
protocol instance when the neighbor address is unreachable. This is
caused by changing the line
if (!p-neigh)
to
if (!p-neigh || (p-neigh-scope ==
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 05:50:42PM +0100, Daniel Rimal wrote:
Hello,
i have little weird problem with route selection in bird. A have four
routers in
my AS, routers called R1 and R2 is running guagga, routers called R3 and R4
is running bird 1.2.5. I have configured full mesh between all of
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 03:10:15AM +, Nick wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 03:07:46PM -0600, Stephen Holmes wrote:
I was doing something dumb. When building my configs from my DB, I was
setting the start delay to a random int between 20-60, this was causing the
BGP config to change
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 11:59:11AM +0100, Jerome Durand wrote:
Hi all,
I am running bird 1.2.5 as a RS using classical design (one table per
peer and one master global). I also added in addition a second table
called collector that is just populated as the master table with other
pipes
On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 10:45:04AM +0100, Stefan Jakob wrote:
Dear List,
Currently I am wondering, how I can improve this situation:
2011-02-09 10:34:36 TRACE RABCD_0_1: Connection lost (No route to host)
2011-02-09 10:34:36 TRACE RABCD_0_1: Connect delayed by 5 seconds
2011-02-09
On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 06:32:21PM +0100, Simone Morandini wrote:
Hi all,
In the scenario where filters was applied on pipes, not on BGP
protocols,
all received routes can be viewed via CLI:
show route protocol PEER table TABLE_FOR_THAT_PEER.
apologies for upping my thread, but I'd
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 11:35:20AM +0100, Giuseppe Ravasio wrote:
it seems that linux doesn't allow to set blackhole ipv6 routes without
specifing the device:
root@:~# ip -f inet6 route add blackhole 2a01:9c01::/32
RTNETLINK answers: No such device
if I append dev lo the route inserts
Hello
I found that there is already one running (empty) wiki as a part
of Redmine project management webapp used for BIRD.
I added some examples and FAQs for a start:
https://git.nic.cz/redmine/projects/bird/wiki
You could try to register and edit it.
--
Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo
Ondrej
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 09:27:39AM +0100, Christian Riede wrote:
protocol bgp {
local as 65535;
neighbor 2001:67c:39c:8001::8000:a as 65535;
First, 65535 as ASN is not allowed. Such connect is rejected.
Second, these connects are from different (non-configured) addresses, so
1 - 100 of 538 matches
Mail list logo
