On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 10:47:08AM +0530, Ramanathan Selvamani wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> I configured l3vpn in BIRD and I was able to see the routes are learnt and
> advertised based on RT.
>
> All the routes in this VRF are advertised with RT (1:11) to neighbors.
Hi
I am glad you tried this MPLS
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 03:32:20PM +0200, Maria Matejka wrote:
> We can simply change the lexer state externally from the parser as soon as
> the hex( prefix is seen, and provide the result directly from the lexer.
>
> This way, we can allow all the syntaxes like hex(de-ad-be-ef),
>
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 01:08:15PM +0200, Alexander Zubkov via Bird-users wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The main concern is that a 6-byte bytestring conflicts with the MAC address
> representation. Bird does not have the type for it currently, but who
> knows, it might need it in the future. So we might need
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 02:40:42PM +0200, Maria Matejka via Bird-users wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I think using hex() and base64() with adding these two tokens to the
> "kw_sym:" non-terminal. This way, no current config should break.
I would prefer hex:XX:YY:... to hex(XX:YY:...) to emphasize it is
On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 11:21:36PM +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen via Bird-users
wrote:
> > I have some more changes to make to the dampening patch, but if we're in
> > agreement that this direction is the way to go I'll get a v1 out ASAP.
> >
> > You can merge Toke's patches independently of that
On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 12:59:11PM +0200, Tim Weippert via Bird-users wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> maybe i'm doing something wrong, but if i use some quick and dirty
> filter on the CLI all is working as expecting:
>
> show route where bgp_large_community ~ [(65000, 0, 1001)]
> show route where
On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 05:27:01PM +0200, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> Hi
>
> Yes, it is a bug in BIRD. When BGP capability option is parsed, the
> capability structure is initialized with the proper default value, but
> when there is no BGP capability option altogether (lik
On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 05:15:43PM +0200, Nico Schottelius via Bird-users wrote:
>
> Hello fellow bird users,
>
> a quick IGP/iBGP question:
>
> Why does apu-router1 that should learn the IPv6 default route from
> server138 complain about not accepting the route?
>
> May 12 17:13:18
On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 03:06:48PM +0300, Mikhail Grishin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We ran BGP roles at 1000+ BGP sessions.
> About 0.5 - 1% of them affected by some issue. Probably all of them -
> Juniper with the old junos.
>
> At the same time, question to the stage 3) - why Bird gererate such message?
On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 10:19:04AM +0200, Marek Küthe wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a few questions about RFC 9234 or `local role role-name` in
> bird. Is the OTC attribute kept even if you don`t have a `local role`?
Hello
Yes, it is handled as any optional transitive attribute.
> If yes, how to
On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 09:31:08AM +, Mazur, Dariusz via Bird-users wrote:
> Hello Bird users,
> I was trying to find how to configure BGP as-override in BIRD, but without
> success.
Hello
There is 'allow local as' BGP option:
On Fri, May 05, 2023 at 01:10:10PM +0300, Mikhail Grishin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried the same at BIRD 2.13 . It reports "Can't add set".
>
> At the same time in docs
> --
> |add(/C/,/P/)| adds pair (or quad) /P/ to clist /C/ and returns the result.
> If item /P/ is already in clist /C/, it does
On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 03:51:22PM -0400, Mingwei Zheng wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am doing testing work on network protocols and here is one possible issue I
> noticed in OSPF.
>
> I noticed that you have checked the length of lsa in your function
> ospf_dump_lsupd in lsupd.c
>
On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 12:28:59AM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The recent bird1 EOL announcement nudged me to try a 1 to 1 (or close to
> it) migration of a legacy 1.6 config to 2.0. Without using any of the
> fancy new 2.0 features to keep things lazy.
>
> The old config has a giant
On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 12:28:59AM +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The recent bird1 EOL announcement nudged me to try a 1 to 1 (or close to
> it) migration of a legacy 1.6 config to 2.0. Without using any of the
> fancy new 2.0 features to keep things lazy.
>
> The old config has a giant
On Sun, Apr 23, 2023 at 07:37:02PM -0400, Mingwei Zheng wrote:
> Hi,
> I am doing testing work on network protocols and there is one possible issue
> I noticed in RIP:
> When packet command is RIP_CMD_UPDATE_REQUEST, the protocol will call
> function rip_receive_request to respond to
On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 04:46:13PM +0200, Luiz Amaral wrote:
> Hello Ondrej,
>
> Did you have a chance to check out the patch? I am happy to adjust it if
> needed.
Hello
Thanks for a notice, i just merged that (with minor modification):
On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 11:47:12PM +0600, saiful...@fiberathome.net wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for your feedback. The topology is BIRD is connected with total 8
> neighbors (1 is non-client and 7 are in client mode) for my setup. The
> non-client neighbor is actually a high end central RR router
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 10:19:29PM +0600, saiful...@fiberathome.net wrote:
> Dear Concern,
>
> After installing BIRD, I made iBGP neighbor with 8 routers. From a
> non-client neighbor it should receive about 106362 prefixes but I found it
> is taking huge time to process and converge the
On Mon, Apr 03, 2023 at 05:08:43PM +0800, Edward Sun wrote:
> Hi,
> Starting from bird v2.0.11, BGP med attribute will not be zero and
> propagate to the external BGP neighbor. How to empty the BGP med
> attribute when export?
Hi
This is a bug, thanks for the bugreport. You can workaround it by
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 03:17:46PM +0800, Miao Wang wrote:
> > Thanks for the bugreport. The code in static_update_bfd() has a clear
> > bug, but i am not sure if just putting IPA_NONE to bfd_request_session()
> > is a reasonable fix, i will have to check BFD code to see how much it
> > assumes
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 06:02:38AM +0800, Miao Wang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The bug can be reproduced with the following steps:
>
> 1. create an unnumbered interface:
>
> # ip link add dummy0 type dummy
> # ip link set dummy0 up
> # ip neigh replace 169.254.0.1 lladdr dev dummy0
>
> 2. Create a
On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 01:01:16PM +, Ochalski, Radoslaw via Bird-users
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if there is a way to match extended communities via all ASNs
> wildcard?
>
> As per https://bird.network.cz/?get_doc=16=bird-5.html, it’s not possible:
>
> EC sets use similar
On Sun, Mar 12, 2023 at 02:36:50PM +0100, d...@darkboxed.org wrote:
> I noticed something in tcpdump just now, when using -iany the incorrect RA
> advert shows up as an "M" (multicast) as opposed to "Out" on the correct
> interface. This only happens when sending an RA on enp2s0 not any of the
>
On Sat, Mar 11, 2023 at 06:28:58AM +0100, Daniel Gröber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using bird as a replacement for radvd since the latter has a
> longstanding issue with sending adverts on unconfigured interfaces under
> complex conditions.
>
> Turns out bird has a similar issue :)
>
> Looking at the
On Tue, Mar 07, 2023 at 01:01:36AM +0100, Robert Scheck wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Sep 2021, Robert Scheck wrote:
> > rpki-client recently implemented the "expires" instruction for roa-sets
> > that OpenBGPD provides [1][2]. As of writing, BIRD does not seem to have
> > something similar...any chance for
On Sun, Mar 05, 2023 at 04:34:40PM +0100, Petr Vaněk wrote:
> Printf test suite fails on systems with musl libc because tests for "%m"
> and "%M" formats expect "Input/output error" message but musl returns
> "I/O error". Proposed change compares the printf output with string
> returned from
On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 02:57:54PM -0500, Mirai Azayaka wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to send routes from my DHCPv6 prefix delegation server to
> my router using iBGP. Those delegated prefix routes on the DHCPv6
> server are installed in its kernel table, such as 2001:db8:db8::/56
> via . I
On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 07:39:30PM -0500, Charles Butera wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am unable to get bird static routes with MPLS labels installed in the
> kernel routing table on Centos 7 (with upgraded kernel 5.12).
Hello
I thing Centos 7 has too old kernel headers and BIRD packages are built
On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 10:39:15AM +, Alexander Chernikov wrote:
> Dear bird team,
>
> The GitHub cz-nic/bird repository mirror looks stale - the last commit there
> is from October 5, 2020?
> Is this intentional?
Hello
Well, i was not even aware of such mirror. At least it seems it is an
On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 02:47:39PM +0100, ico wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Here at $work we are using bird for OSPF at some 30 linux boxes. Works
> great. But there is a thing that confuses me:
> ...
> When I run bird with this configuration, it inserts another route:
>
> # ip route
> 10.0.0.0/24 dev
On Sat, Feb 18, 2023 at 03:41:31PM +0100, Luiz Amaral wrote:
> Hello,
>
> While experimenting in FreeBSD 13.1 with IPv4 over IPv6 nexthop routes, I
> realized that BIRD was unable to read routes from the kernel as well as
> export routes to the kernel. The support for it was implemented in
On Sun, Feb 19, 2023 at 06:28:03PM +0100, Sebastian Hahn wrote:
> Hi Alexander,
>
> thanks a lot for the fast response.
>
> > On 19. Feb 2023, at 16:31, Alexander Zubkov wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I doubt that strict bind option is incompatible with multihop. Do you have
> > some problems with
On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 06:25:33PM +0100, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> > 1) Changed the name of the option to 'extended next hop', for consistency
> > with BGP (and in the future also with other protocols). As the option is
> > enabled by default, the name likely does not matter that much.
>
> I
On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 06:04:33PM +0100, Andreas Rammhold wrote:
> > Please check it, if it is acceptable for you, i will merge it to the master
> > branch.
>
> These all sound fine. I've run it through my bird<->bird<->babeld<->babeld
> test network and it passed.
>
> The changes look fine if
On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 11:42:33AM +0100, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> Ondrej Zajicek writes:
>
> > On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 08:05:41PM +0100, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> >> > I think that simple sequence numbers work in two cases - if there is
> >> >
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 03:57:47PM +0100, Andreas Rammhold wrote:
> Any chance you could give this a look yet?
Hi
Finally i got to process the patch and prepare it for merging.
I did some changes, mainly:
1) Changed the name of the option to 'extended next hop', for consistency
with BGP (and in
On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 02:56:56PM +, LIU Chris wrote:
> Hi Zajicek,
>
> Many thanks for your reply.
> No any problem to set just one BFD instance. In my case, I have multiple BGP
> instances, I set bfd on inside each BGP instance.
> If just one bfd instance, how do bird correlate with
On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 02:02:05PM +0100, d...@darkboxed.org wrote:
> Hi Maria,
>
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 02:19:53PM +0100, Maria Matejka wrote:
> > Picking up this, hoping that it is still relevant.
>
> Yes, absolutely :)
>
> > You can do this as the import/export limits in BGP do exactly
On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 03:58:04PM +, LIU Chris via Bird-users wrote:
> Anyone comment this issue ?
>
> From: Bird-users On Behalf Of LIU Chris via
> Bird-users
> Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2023 4:01 PM
> To: bird-users@network.cz
> Subject: RE: Bird bfd configuration
>
> Hello,
>
> I am
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 07:49:03PM +0100, d...@darkboxed.org wrote:
> > > Couple of comments on the code below:
> > >
> > > > Changes in v3:
> > > > - Subsume FIB_RESTART v2 patch: instead of restarting FIB iteration
> > > >we keep lists of actions to perform after FIB iteration is finished.
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 05:59:25PM +0100, Martin Weinelt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks for the patch. I'm running it on a few machines and it simplifies
> address management significantly, since it allows us to deallocate lots of
> address pairs from all tunnel interfaces.
>
> Want to repeat the
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 12:38:25PM +0100, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen via Bird-users
wrote:
> Daniel Gröber writes:
> > This allows for filtering routes from specific interfaces and
> > neighbours. With the current internal route selection proto babel exports
> > only up to one route and an admin
On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 11:07:59PM +0100, d...@darkboxed.org wrote:
> Hi Toke,
>
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 10:50:14PM +0100, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> > Daniel Gröber writes:
> >
> > > The route expiration code appears to have been stolen from rip.c, in that
> > > code the rt_notify
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 11:55:50AM +0100, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen via Bird-users
wrote:
> When creating a new babel_source object we initialise the seqno to 0. The
> caller will update the source object with the right metric and seqno value,
> for both newly created and old source objects. However
On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 11:10:28PM +0100, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen via Bird-users
wrote:
> Juliusz Chroboczek writes:
>
> >> The problematic bit is, I think, 's' in babel_handle_update can be NULL
> >> because nothing ensures the babel_source for a particular neighbour
> >> actually exists here:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 11:15:52PM +0100, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen via Bird-users
wrote:
> Juliusz noticed there were a couple of places we were doing straight
> inequality comparisons of seqnos in Babel. This is wrong because seqnos can
> wrap: so we need to use the modulo-64k comparison function
On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 04:44:27AM +0100, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> > Note that this does very much represent a breaking change as now export
> > filters have to explicitly re-export babel routes which was implicit
> > before, using say `source = RTS_BABEL`.
> >
> > I
On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 12:54:15AM +0100, Daniel Gröber wrote:
> The main motivation for this change is to allow for ingress route
> filtering. With the current internal route selection proto/babel exports
> only the one route it selected and an admin cannot decide which
> neighbours/interfaces to
On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 02:18:36PM +, Kenth Eriksson wrote:
> I have a setup as in the attached drawing. I can see that the bird ABR
> node (R2) sets the E-bit and the B-bit in the router LSA. The B-bit seems
> correct as it is the ABR, but it is not an ASBR.
Hi
It depends on config. if
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 08:05:41PM +0100, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> > I think that simple sequence numbers work in two cases - if there is
> > sufficient interval between packets, or there is only one packet
> > flying (e.g. LSREQ-LSUPD ping-pong in OSPF). That is approach used in
> > OSPFv2
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 12:12:19AM +0100, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen via Bird-users
wrote:
> The issue has been described in draft-ietf-babel-mac-relaxed, which is
> currently pending RFC publication. That also describes two mitigation
> mechanisms: Keeping separate PC counters for unicast and
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 03:19:43AM +0100, Alexander Zubkov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Not sure if those are forgotten or are unwanted modifications. Please let
> me know.
>
> And I also have another idea regarding the subject. The idea is to
> configure the file where bird will keep the states of the
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 07:44:47AM +0100, Maria Matejka wrote:
> >Hello
> >
> >I thing that the most elegant way how to handle renaming of objects
> >during reconfiguration is to allow multiple names / aliases. There could
> >be be more symbols pointing to given object (but the object points back
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 06:57:01AM +0100, Maria Matejka via Bird-users wrote:
> Hello!
>
> > For example I may want to refactor the naming scheme for
> > protocols/tables in my bird config. But when I apply the new config with
> > the new names, such renamed protocols will be recreated or
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 12:40:30AM +0100, Alexander Zubkov wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> A quick try to fix the problem. But I'm not sure in complete correctness
> though.
Hi
That looks more-or-less OK, will merge.
> -ipa_equal(x->addr, y->addr);
> +ipa_equal(x->addr, y->addr) &&
> +
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 02:48:13AM +0100, Alexander Zubkov via Bird-users wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I found some bad indenting of if/else statements. Please see the attached
> patch.
Hello
Merged.
--
Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo
Ondrej 'Santiago' Zajicek (email: santi...@crfreenet.org)
OpenPGP
On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 03:21:36PM +0100, Thomas Liske wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Liske
> ---
>
> This patch sets the PR_SET_DUMPABLE capability before switching
> to a unprivileged user to allow core dumps (see also the paragraph
> about set-user-ID in `man 5 core`)
>
> Background: While
On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 04:37:08PM +0100, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 03:32:52PM +0100, Marcel Menzel via Bird-users wrote:
> > Hello list,
> >
> > Is there a way to instruct BIRD to only match OSPF interfaces that are
> > enslaved to a certai
On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 03:32:52PM +0100, Marcel Menzel via Bird-users wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> Is there a way to instruct BIRD to only match OSPF interfaces that are
> enslaved to a certain VRF (or only the main VRF / not enslaved to any VRF)?
Hello
It should work by default, seems that there
On Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 06:05:16PM +, Prem Anand wrote:
> Hi all,
> New user here
>
> I am trying to get 2 ebgp neighbours on bird to peer with a remote bgp
> endpoint on frr node.
> One between 10.100.101.1 <—> 10.100.1.1 and other between 10.100.102.1 <—>
> 10.100.1.1
>
>
On Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 04:18:47PM +0100, Konrad Kręciwilk wrote:
> As you can see show ospf state from R1 has extrenal 10.7.100.0/24 via
> 212.127.92.29 (which is local link via vlan4001) which is interrupted (L2).
> Its look like R3 does not update database (via) when neighbor is lost
>
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 11:45:01PM +0100, Konrad Kręciwilk via Bird-users wrote:
> Hello Team,
Hello
> but when on the switch remove e.g. vlan4001 to R3 (broken L2 connectivity),
> R1 still see via vlan4001 (all dead times have expired - configured bfd).
So even if OSPF neighbor is
On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 05:35:04PM +, Kenth Eriksson wrote:
> Is there any way to control if bird generates type 4 LSAs? If bird originates
> type 4 LSA:s, does that mean that bird has taken the role as an ASBR?
Hi
Type 4 LSAs are generated automatically on ABR (not ASBR), i.e. if there
are
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 04:51:44PM +0100, Radu CARPA wrote:
> Hi bird users,
>
> I recently came across the following thread [1] when trying to build an
> IP-in-IP overlay network with bird. Unfortunately, those patches where never
> merged upstream. Calico still uses a very old fork of bird with
On Sat, Jan 14, 2023 at 12:25:11AM +, Theera Kittichareonpot wrote:
> Hello,
>
> OSPF with cryptographic authentication does work now. In Mikrotiks 7.7, the
> auth-id is defaulted to 0. https://help.mikrotik.com/docs/display/ROS/OSPF
> Changing that to 1 does fix the problem. ^^
Hello
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 08:02:23PM -0800, Mike Crute wrote:
> I think it's okay that this only prints to the debug log file/stderr. I
> think a person would try debug mode first when they encouter a crash before
> doing more invasive debugging.
>
> Here's a revised patch that incorporates your
On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 03:47:11PM +0100, Oriol Rico wrote:
> The problem is that all antennas that advertise this route are over the
> same interface in the rest of the antennas, over wlan interface
You only need to set link cost for the two antennas advertising the 10.0.0.0/8.
Therefore you
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 11:51:12AM -0800, Michael Crute wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2023, at 08:36, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> > 1) vlog() (which is internally caled from bug()) is not safe to call from
> > a signal handler, as it internally takes a mutex, if the signal is re
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 01:28:27AM +0200, Garri Djavadyan via Bird-users wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I noticed that the legacy Bird version behaves strangely while it is in
> an enhanced route-refreshing process, but I am not sure whether it is a
> known/expected behaviour for version 1.6.8.
On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 08:07:09AM +0200, Martin Vystrčil via Bird-users wrote:
> Good morning,
>
> is there any possibility to be notified on network update. We are using bird
> to manage BABEL in our product (embedded system).
>
> Main usage would be to send SNMP notification on BABEL network
On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 12:59:47AM +0100, Mihai via Bird-users wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On the same server I am running two BIRD processes each configured with OSPF
> and iBGP (toward the same neighbors, using different local addresses).
> Should BFD for iBGP work on both processes?
> In my case all BFD
On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 05:00:07PM +0200, Ondrej Zajicek via Bird-users wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 11:04:52AM +, Saklak, Marcin via Bird-users wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I have an issue with onlink static routes bird constantly remove and add
> > them to kernel.
>
On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 11:04:52AM +, Saklak, Marcin via Bird-users wrote:
> Hi,
> I have an issue with onlink static routes bird constantly remove and add them
> to kernel.
>
> Is this expected behavior that for ipv6 onlink route bird after each scan
> time remove and add route? for other
Note that for gw_mode == GW_DIRECT, even before the patch we prefererred
the global next hop to link-local (see bgp_apply_next_hop()), so that why
there is a different default based on gw_mode, but the second part
(switching next hop to link-local for gw_mode == GW_DIRECT) is not
implemented yet.
&
se global next hop instead of link-local:
https://gitlab.nic.cz/labs/bird/-/commit/8f79e6b93e32a4eb7e4dda9bd4a9d04400b79d45
> On 9/20/22, 6:11 PM, "Ondrej Zajicek" wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 01:23:28PM +, Mazur, Dariusz via Bird-users
> wrote:
> &
On Sun, Oct 09, 2022 at 07:43:56PM +0200, Bernd Naumann via Bird-users wrote:
> On 2022-10-07 18:32, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> > Does the pppoe-wan have link-local address range? Does BIRD know about it?
> > What is What is the output from BIRD command 'show interfaces'?
>
On Fri, Oct 07, 2022 at 11:29:33AM +0200, Bernd Naumann via Bird-users wrote:
> Update:
>
> I would ratter prefer to understand why bird is unable to pick up the ipv6
> default route on this pppoe device.
Hi
Does the pppoe-wan have link-local address range? Does BIRD know about it?
What is
On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 11:37:18AM +0200, Bernd Naumann via Bird-users wrote:
> I may should have had a look at the log before :/
>
> ```
> Thu Oct 6 09:32:51 2022 daemon.err bird: KRT: Received route ::/0 with
> strange next-hop fe80::f6cc:55ff:fe42:1a94
> ```
>
> But why is this a strange a
On Mon, Oct 03, 2022 at 04:20:51AM +0200, Olivier Benghozi via Bird-users wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm currently using RIP/Ripng with md5 auth with some Cisco/Juniper and
> Quagga gears.
> I'm looking to switch from quagga to Bird(2).
>
> I would have a feature request about the RIP MD5 sequence
On Mon, Oct 03, 2022 at 07:07:58PM +0200, Marek Küthe via Bird-users wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I hope this is the right place to ask my question:
>
> I used bird2.0.10 (from debian backports) since some time I get the
> message "Netlink: No route to host", however in the bird log it does
> not specify
On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 12:22:10PM +0900, 안상혁 via Bird-users wrote:
> Hello,
>
> we have encountered some issues using bird 1.6.8
>
> there are two issues :
>
> 1) sometimes bird looks like doesn't handle neighbor's bgp keepalive
> messages.
It is good idea to check which are effective
On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 12:18:48PM +, Milovancevic, Nemanja via Bird-users
wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Since some of our customers have devices which are not supporting EBGP
> add-path capability, I was wondering would there be an option that BIRD
> announces also other “not only best” paths,
On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 09:13:55AM +0100, Ian Chilton wrote:
> Hi Barry!
>
> On Thu, 18 Aug 2022, at 6:08 PM, Barry O'Donovan (INEX) wrote:
> > As you're running Bird 2.0.8 this should be no longer necessary. Per
> > 2.0.8's release logs:
> > > Version 2.0.8 (2021-03-18)
> > > o Automatic
On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 02:38:59PM +, mukund via Bird-users wrote:
>
> Hi,
> We are using bird version 2.0.9. We have IXIA traffic which is sending 16K
> OSPF routes to our App which we send to Bird. Issue is seen when we restart
> our App. As part of our restart app handling, we
On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 01:23:28PM +, Mazur, Dariusz via Bird-users wrote:
> Hello,
> In my setup I have iBGP session with peer , and I learn v6 route. It is iBGP
> so we have 2 next hops global and link-local. By default bird uses link-local
> when route is exported to kernel. Is there any
On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 09:32:31AM +0200, Tore Anderson via Bird-users wrote:
> Hi
>
> Is it possible to garbage collect unused dynamic BGP neighbours?
Hi
i think that 'configure' CLI command should remove unused dynamic BGP
instaces as a side-effect of its unused protocols cleanup code, even
On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 08:08:09PM +, Jose Miguel Bentue wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The goal is to gain communication from a linux based host to another PE-CE by
> using MPLS L3VPN.
>
> To your question:
>
> * "configure the PE functionality, connecting to other PE via BGP with
> MPLS (AFI 1
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 05:23:16PM +0500, Ivan wrote:
> Hi all.
> I use bird2 (2.0.7) on linux, I want to configure the RIP protocol so that
> it uses the specified source address. I have two addresses assigned on the
> network interface, for example 192.0.2.1/32 and 198.51.100.1/31.
> bird
On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 01:40:17PM +0200, Marcus Büttemeyer wrote:
> Hello again,
> I'm wondering how OSPF default metrics are calculated by BIRD?
> Background: I'm running 4 Linux VMs with BIRD under Hyper-V and BIRD gives
> me a metric of 10 for every connection, be it 10G (which seems to be the
On Sun, Aug 07, 2022 at 04:24:22PM +0200, Marcus Büttemeyer wrote:
> OK, the problem seems to have been the name of the filter. BIRD says
> "syntax error, unexpected DEFAULT" so I renamed the filter to
> "reject_default" and that works. What did BIRD not like about
> "default-reject"?
Hi
BIRD
On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 04:00:53PM +0200, d...@darkboxed.org wrote:
> Hi Ondrej,
>
> did you ever see my v2 patchset?
>
> [PATCH v2 1/2] Netlink: Drop ECMP route splitting hacks
> [PATCH v2 2/2] Netlink: Propagate ECMP nexthop weight to kernel for inet6
> routes
>
> Since I never heard
On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 04:00:53PM +0200, d...@darkboxed.org wrote:
> Hi Ondrej,
>
> did you ever see my v2 patchset?
>
> [PATCH v2 1/2] Netlink: Drop ECMP route splitting hacks
> [PATCH v2 2/2] Netlink: Propagate ECMP nexthop weight to kernel for inet6
> routes
>
> Since I never heard
On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 04:06:57PM +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> Ondrej Zajicek writes:
>
> > On Sat, Apr 16, 2022 at 07:28:59PM +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> >> Daniel Gröber writes:
> >>
> >> > When dumping the routing tabl
On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 09:01:42AM -0400, Robert Blayzor wrote:
> Bird 2.0.10
>
>
> I have BGP neighbors I only want to advertise ipv4 or ipv6 to, not both. It
> appears BIRD assumes both even though I only have either a ipv4 or ipv6
> channel configured for the protocol. (not both) Is v4
On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 05:36:20PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jul 14, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
>
> > > RFC 8950 is what has been implemented in Cumulus.
> > Not sure how that is relevant, RFC 8950 is just IPv6 next hop for IPv4
> > routes, it does not handle BGP neig
On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 05:17:25PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jul 14, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
>
> > The main issue is that dynamic range works primarily as passive, as there
> > is no neighbor discovery. I think there is some RFC draft for BGP neighbor
> > discovery,
On Sat, Jul 09, 2022 at 10:53:28AM +0200, Nico Schottelius wrote:
>
> Good morning^2,
>
> as virtually all parts in our datacenters have become IPv6 only, I was
> wondering if it was easy to add a feature to bird to automatically BGP
> peer with all alive link local neighbours?
>
> Motivation
On Sat, Jul 09, 2022 at 10:44:26AM +0200, Nico Schottelius wrote:
>
> Good morning fellow bird users,
>
> I was wondering how you handle "dynamic reconfigurations" such as
> rerouting, adding filters, changing the priority of routes in case of
> attacks?
>
> In particular I wonder if there is a
On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 01:54:15PM +0300, Eugene Bogomazov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've reviewed all the changes and am happy with them. Had some misgivings
> about renaming 'strict mode ' to 'required roles' , but since this option
> can be easily found by searching for a phrase in the
101 - 200 of 1391 matches
Mail list logo
