On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 12:37:08PM +0300, Eugene Bogomazov wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> The current changes were sufficient to add the described AFI/SAFI check.
> Role/OTC rules now only apply to the unicast session. I've checked this on
> a stand with a mixture of multicast and unicast sessions
On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 07:07:53PM +0200, Maria Matejka wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On 6/27/22 1:21 PM, Eugene Bogomazov wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I checked BIRD v2.0.10 and didn't find the channel argument in
> > bgp_preexport. So AFI/SAFI checks still can't be added there. When will
> > it appear? And
On Sat, Jun 25, 2022 at 10:00:14PM +0300, Mikhail Mayorov wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I would like use ECMP for 0.0.0.0/0. This route announced on 10.10.97.33,
> 10.10.97.72, 10.10.97.73 as LSA5. Below I have given the output of the
> command on the router 10.10.97.67.
> I expected to see a default route
On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 01:35:36PM +0300, Eugene Bogomazov wrote:
> TL;DR: What are the best ways to include AFI/SAFI channel check during
> attribute creation?
Hi
> RFC 9234 specifically clarifies that it can only be applied on IPv4/IPv6
> unicast sessions. On all other sessions the OTC
On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 04:20:19AM -0700, Valery Lutoshkin wrote:
> Hi all!
>
>
> I use bird2 (2.0.9) as RS for BGP prefix aggregation - several peers send
> me their prefixes, I aggregate them and send the result to the system.
>
>
> But there is an obvious issue - when peers send me the same
On Thu, Jun 02, 2022 at 04:16:53PM +0200, Thomas Steen Rasmussen wrote:
> Hello :)
>
> I am using BIRD on FreeBSD and it is working okay, apart from missing CARP
> awareness. I am wondering if anyone knows if work has been done in this area
> already?
>
> Ideally BIRD would understand CARP
On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 02:38:07PM +0300, Eugene Bogomazov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> RFC 9234 provides a new mechanism for route leak detection and prevention.
>
> In the attachment you can find a patch which introduces this functionality
> for BIRD 2.0.9.
Hello
Thanks for the patch, i will check it
On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 11:57:31AM -0300, James Oakley wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to write a filter for a Babel protocol where I set a value based
> on the Babel router ID. I can see Babel.router_id in the route attributes,
> but
> it does not look like this is exposed to filters. Only
On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 12:07:48PM -0300, Douglas Fischer wrote:
> During your talk(on video) I thought that splitting conf files, mostly
> variables like prefix-list and AS-Path Regex that are unique by each peer,
> cloud be a way to reduce the workload of parsing configs on reconfiguration.
>
>
On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 02:52:21PM +0200, Job Snijders wrote:
> Hi Douglas,
>
> Rejecting a route *and* tagging it with a community is not what causes
> problems: because you are *rejecting* the route (for example because
> bogon, or rpki-invalid), there is no routing churn problem further
>
On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 08:21:27PM +0200, Luiz Amaral wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Recently I needed to check the address and port for my cache server,
> only to find out that the "show protocol all rpki1" output omitted the port.
>
> This small patch appends the port after the cache server address on
On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 08:15:06PM +0200, Luiz Amaral wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I made a small patch that adds VRF support to the RPKI protocol. I did
> some basic testing with and without VRF and it worked as expected.
> Please let me know if I missed anything.
Hello
Thanks, merged.
--
Elen sila
On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 02:12:13PM +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> The Babel seqno request code keeps track of which seqno requests are
> outstanding for a neighbour by putting them onto a per-neighbour list. When
> reusing a seqno request, it will try to remove this node, but if the seqno
On Sun, May 22, 2022 at 10:28:12PM +0200, d...@darkboxed.org wrote:
> After looking at this more I realise now how bird is splitting multiple
> ipv6 nexthops into sequences of route updates for the same prefix.
>
> Consequently the code doing this should also be removed. Though it seems it
>
On Mon, May 02, 2022 at 05:06:48PM +0800, Huiyuze Zhi wrote:
> Hi there,
> I'm having some issues with using bird2 to carry downstream. I have
> two different types of upstream. One can take downstream and the other
> cannot. I use bgp_large_community (141011, 3, xxx) to mark every prefix
On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 10:31:26PM +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> Ondrej Zajicek writes:
> > BTW, when we added CI tests for Babel authentication, we noticed that it
> > has rather slow convergence after reconfiguration. The reason is that
> > when authentication
On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 08:06:24PM +0200, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> > Did not yet checked the code how smoothing is done here, but seems to me
> > that considering:
> >
> > 1) There is baseline RTT from distance / speed of propagation
> > 2) There is one-side noise from congestion
> > 3) The
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 10:57:16AM +0800, Alexandre Corso wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I found a strange behaviour on my BIRD route reflector:
>
> BIRD version: 2.0.7
> Topology:
> -- vrr01_ny2_nyc
> RR1||
> -- vrr01_pa4_par CORE1
>
>
> I have one route
On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 01:48:46AM +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> Hi everyone
>
> I've implemented the Babel RTT extension specified in
> draft-ietf-babel-rtt-extension in Bird. I've tested that it talks to
> babeld on a single link and that the two implementations agree on each
> others'
Thanks, merged.
On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 11:26:06AM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ---
> doc/bird.sgml | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/doc/bird.sgml b/doc/bird.sgml
> index 9c4a6f68a447..1580facd8155 100644
> --- a/doc/bird.sgml
> +++ b/doc/bird.sgml
> @@
On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 01:43:21AM +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> When shutting down a Babel instance we send a wildcard retraction to make
> sure all peers can quickly switch to other route origins. Add another small
> optimisation borrowed from babeld: sending a Hello message (along with
On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 04:43:32AM +0200, Alexander Zubkov wrote:
> For example bird can check that the hold timer proposed by a peer is
> at least 2 times greater than the local keepalive timer as in the
> attached patch.
Hi
Thanks for the patch. You are right, it would be a good idea to check
On Sat, Apr 16, 2022 at 07:28:59PM +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> Daniel Gröber writes:
>
> > When dumping the routing table bird currently doesn't set the rtm_table
> > netlink field to select any particular one but rather wants to get all at
> > once.
> >
> > This can be problematic
On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 01:24:09AM +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> The debug output was not updated with the rest of the code, so packets.c
> fails to compile if LOCAL_DEBUG is set.
Thanks, will merge.
>
> Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
> ---
> proto/babel/packets.c | 2 +-
> 1
On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 12:45:29AM -0700, gautham devalapalli wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am using BIRD 2.0.8 to establish a bgp session with a nexus switch. I am
> trying to set bgp ext community link bandwidth. Since this is not
> explicitly supported I am following the thread below to set it as
On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 08:44:50AM -0300, Douglas Fischer wrote:
> The question raised by colleague Irene reminded me of a topic that may or
> may not be the focus of BIRD's development.
>
> I imagine that the biggest supporters of SMP/Multi-Core/Thread-Safe
> evolution on BIRD are Operators of
On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 10:48:19AM +0200, Irene Lalioti wrote:
> Hello dear community,
>
> I would like to pose a question regarding the error I receive concerning BFD
> : socket operation not permitted.
>
> The bfd is configured with multiplier 3; interval 300ms; idle tx interval 1
> sec;
Hi
On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 03:57:12PM +0200, Alexander Zubkov wrote:
> Not exactly. Yes, the session is handled by the kernel. But it should
> be possible to set the TTL before listening to the socket. Looks like
> bird just do not use the TTL for the listening BGP sessions before it
> gets incoming
On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 05:32:02PM -0600, Trisha Biswas wrote:
> Add support for setting the TCP congestion control algorithm per
> destination by
>
> modifying route attributes in BIRD. Previously supported kernel route
> attributes
>
> in BIRD were all integer values. Subsequently, this also
On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 01:46:26PM +, Xavier Trilla wrote:
> Hi Alexander,
>
> Ok, I'm trying to wrap my head around this, so the idea is to filter based on
> route reachability, forcing recursive routes?
I agree with Alexander, that is a pretty elegant way to solve this issue.
> >Add
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 08:52:00PM +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 16 March 2022 20:21 +01, Ondrej Zajicek:
>
> > Updated BIRD to accept 240/4 as 'site' scope. We went with slightly
> > different patch:
> >
> > https://gitlab.nic.cz/labs/bird/-/commit/269bfff9bf
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 10:02:25AM +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> 240.0.0.0/4 is marked as reserved and considered invalid by BIRD. At
> work, we are using this range internally since all RFC 1918 are full
> and 100.64.0.0/10 is already used too. BIRD complains loudly for each
> interface using
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 05:30:48PM +0100, Alexander Zubkov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Wow, I see in the next branch we now have recursive functions
> supported. So this function became easier to implement in a config. At
> least I do not want to have it out of the box now.
Hi
Yes, i recently immersed
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 07:48:18AM +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 11 March 2022 04:07 +01, Ondrej Zajicek:
>
> > With this, we likely do not need "ExecReload=/usr/sbin/bird -p" from your
> > patch?
> > (But the remaining changes for RPM are ok.)
>
>
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 07:38:56PM +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> Hey!
>
> "birdc configure" (or any command in fact) exits with 0 on error. This
> is a bit annoying as when using "systemctl reload bird", we get no
> notification there is an error.
>
> Looking at the source code, it seems there
On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 01:44:05PM +, Adrian Brooks wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is it possible to configure the Bird console so that the output isn't
> interrupted with '-More-' statements please? (similar to the Cisco 'terminal
> length 0' command)
>
> I'm using Expect in a Python script to
On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 07:09:33PM +0100, Alexander Zubkov wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2022, 17:43 Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 03:46:53PM +0100, Alexander Zubkov wrote:
> > > Updated patch. Again full and incremental.
> >
> > Thanks, will l
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 02:02:58AM +0200, Alexander Shikov wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I'm trying to inject flowspec routes from bird to Juniper MX box:
>
> route flow4 { dst 109.68.40.15/32; proto 17; dport 53; } {
> bgp_ext_community.add( (generic, 0x8006, 0x0 ) );
> };
>
> route flow4 {
On Sun, Feb 27, 2022 at 04:44:10AM -0500, Ross Tajvar wrote:
> Thanks for all your hard work!
>
> When can we expect to see packages built? I've been using the OBS
> repository, but the packages there are still 2.0.8:
> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:CZ-NIC:bird-latest/bird
Hi
I
On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 09:24:17PM +0800, Aihui Sun wrote:
> ip link add dev gz-hk type wireguard
> wg setconf gz-hk /etc/wireguardconf/gz-hk.conf
> ip link set gz-hk up
> ip addr add fdc8:dc88:ee11:213::192/128 peer fdc8:dc88:ee11:192::213/128 dev
> gz-hk
> ip addr add 169.254.213.192/32 peer
On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 02:55:35AM +0100, Johannes Kimmel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> with bird 2.0.9 previously configured babel interfaces are removed after
> `birdc configure`.
Thanks, fixed:
https://gitlab.nic.cz/labs/bird/-/commit/fcb4dd0c831339c4374ace17d8f2ae6ebfeed279
--
Elen sila lumenn'
On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 02:55:35AM +0100, Johannes Kimmel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> with bird 2.0.9 previously configured babel interfaces are removed after
> `birdc configure`.
>
> ...
>
> As you can see, without changing the config file, the babel interface
> disappears after reconfiguring bird.
>
> It
On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 03:46:53PM +0100, Alexander Zubkov wrote:
> Updated patch. Again full and incremental.
Thanks, will look at it.
> > One solution would be a global constant empty trie, so you can just set
> > pointer to that. Alternative would be just have NULL like in T_SET,
> > but
On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 08:18:35PM +0100, Alexander Zubkov wrote:
> Adding new pathches (v2 - full patch, v1-v2 - incremental from previous):
>
> 1) Modified as_path_filter function - added additional parameter to
> choose between using set or key parameter. Now empty set does not work
> like a
On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 03:02:55AM +0100, Alexander Zubkov wrote:
> > Also to your previous question:
> >
> > > > I also think now - why at all do we need a typed empty set? I think it
> > > > is possible to add an untyped empty set, that will act as a "joker"
> > > > with any types. It should fit
On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 11:01:25PM +0100, Alexander Zubkov wrote:
> Made some example changes to allow the use of an empty set, which
> works with all types and prefixes too. Its value has type T_SET with
> NULL pointer to the tree. Looks goot at the first sight.
Hi
Is assigning [] to variable
On Sat, Feb 19, 2022 at 12:44:11AM +0100, Alarig Le Lay wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I gave the 2.0.9 git snapshot (71c9484b00b4428ae6c7d7c8eea6d96073683a54)
> a try tonight, and it seems to fix the issue for me. I’ve not tested on
> 5.10 though, as the LTS is now 5.15.
> However, I did test 5.15 with
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 03:32:55AM +0100, Arsen Arsenović wrote:
> Good evening!
>
> When configuring BGP on a site BIRD fails to recognize whether an IP is
> directly connected. It appears to scan over the list of interfaces and
> check whether their subnets contain the target IP instead of
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 01:09:33PM +0100, Christian Bruns wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> we experienced issues with non-functional BFD Sessions. Debugging yielded
> that bird does not use RFC compliant BFD Port ranges.
> RFC 5881 states: "" The source port MUST be in the range 49152 through
> 65535. "";
On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 02:09:59PM +0100, Alexander Zubkov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Let me remind about this once again.
Hi
Sorry for ignoring your previous mail, i needed to focus on finishing
things for 2.0.9, now i can continue with your patches.
1) UDP logging - I have no principal issue with
On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 10:48:40AM -0300, Douglas Fischer wrote:
> Passing by here to drop another ping on the MRAI - Minimum Route
> Advertisement Interval in the BIRD, and also on the RFD -
> Route-Flap-Dampening.
Hi
Several people ask us recently about MRAI / route flap damping, we
will
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 11:47:57PM +0100, Tomas Hlavacek wrote:
> Add netlink KRT dump filter on Linux to avoid PMTU cache records from FNHE
> table dump along with KRT.
>
> Linux Kernel added FNHE table dump to the netlink API in patch
>
>
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 06:57:29PM +0100, Blažej Krajňák wrote:
> Hi,
>
> great to hear that. Are these new changes publicly available to test?
> I could not find on Gitlab.
Hi
It is branch oz-trie-table (
https://gitlab.nic.cz/labs/bird/-/tree/oz-trie-table ),
commit
On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 06:11:32PM +0100, Alexander Zubkov wrote:
> Yes, probably it is ok to use it by default, at least in our case we
> use it always-on (as in attached patch). Only in this case it may be
> better to lower the log level for it then for the cases when it does
> not work.
> With
On Sat, Jan 01, 2022 at 08:10:01PM +0100, Alexander Zubkov wrote:
> I made a patch for that. It works at least for my test case. I had to
> add additional parameter to nl_parse_multipath() function to pass
> information about this exception for dead routes. But may be there are
> better ways to do
On Sat, Jan 08, 2022 at 12:03:52AM +0100, Tomas Hlavacek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The large table that BIRD pulled from the kernel was a FNHE table
> where Linux collects PMTU records for *all* destination IPs that are
> routed to the tunnel (which does not seem to be right and I will
> discuss it in
On Sat, Jan 01, 2022 at 10:07:12PM +0100, Alexander Zubkov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found a funny bug, when made some tests. I found out that if you try
> to give bird a full-length IPv6-address, like:
> :::::::
> :::::::
> You will get an
On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 05:23:13PM +, Dominic Blais wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've had my load of issues with bird 2 on FreeBSD. I used BSDRP like 3 years
> ago and after an update I started having big issues related to bird.
>
> I think BSDRP released version 1.98 with a fix for that.. don't know
ain and again.
> ...
> For some time now I am using a local patch (on top of bird 2.0.8) that
> essentially implements the suggestion that was emerging from the
> discussion:
>
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 09:41:33PM +0200, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> > I see the problem as BIRD i
On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 02:51:34PM +0100, Alexander Zubkov wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'll pop up this old discussion. I've found a bug with bird handling
> its routes when ignore_routes_with_linkdown is enabled. And I suspect
> it is related to this patch.
> The problem is that bird does not replace
On Sun, Nov 14, 2021 at 07:26:44PM +0100, Job Snijders wrote:
> Ping :-)
Thanks, merged. Sorry for keeping it open for so long.
btw, the original 2-condition patch was ok, because condition
addr.roaX.pxlen <= IPX_MAX_PREFIX_LENGTH is deduced from transitivity.
> On Fri, 17 Sep 2021 at 21:34,
On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 06:57:44PM +0100, Alexander wrote:
> On 2021-12-17 18:26, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
>
> > That is interesting. If i remember correctly, in the past Linux removed
> > all secondary addresses (ones from the same net) when the primary
> > address
On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 05:41:40PM +0100, Alexander wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Looks like bird (2.0.8 on Linux) incorrectly handles primary/secondary IP
> address status.
>
> For example, this is initial state (output from "show interfaces"):
>
> enp6s20 up (index=2 master=switch)
> MultiAccess
On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 02:41:28PM +0100, Alexander Zubkov wrote:
> Hi everyone!
>
> I made a couple of patches to do some interesting stuff with communities.
> The first patch allows to pick a component from a standard or a large
> community:
>
> (10, 20, 30) @ 2 --> 20
>
> And the second
On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 04:41:09PM +0100, Nico Schottelius wrote:
>
>
> Ondrej Zajicek writes:
> >> > I expect it is in multihop /
> >> > gateway-recursive mode, as it is default for IBGP?
> >>
> >> It's in direct mode for all links,
On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 02:37:00PM +0100, Nico Schottelius wrote:
>
> Ondrej Zajicek writes:
> > Yes, this is kind of confusing error message (as i noted in response
> > to Simon Ruderich).
>
> If there is one thing I'd suggest to improve first: print out the
> spec
On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 04:34:39PM -0500, m...@routerpro.ca wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am using bird as a RR and have set the add paths tx; option, however I am
> still only seeing best path being advertised.
Hello
That is strange, it should work.
> 3 routes present , with one marked as BEST:
>
>
On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 08:35:48PM +0100, Nico Schottelius wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> every year or then bird is putting me into the Invalid NEXT_HOP
> message.
Hello
Yes, this is kind of confusing error message (as i noted in response
to Simon Ruderich).
> TL;DR:
> Why does bird on
On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 09:22:46AM +0100, Simon Ruderich wrote:
> ---
> Hello,
>
> while debugging "Invalid NEXT_HOP attribute" messages in my setup
> I had to recompile bird2 with additional debug output to
> determine which BAD_NEXT_HOP line was triggered and with which
> NEXT_HOP value. After
On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 09:18:30AM +0100, Sebastian Hahn wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I've been trying to remove v4 transit nets from my setup. This seems to
> work well for BGP (both eBGP and iBGP) - I have routes for all external
> v4 addresses with the appropriate next hop set. For my internal
On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 07:51:21AM +1100, bir...@sensation.net.au wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> If I do several consecutive "show route" queries, the timestamp keeps
> changing back and forth, by about a second. Example:
>
> 0.0.0.0/0 via x.x.x.x on em2.100 [aapt 05:20:28] * (100) [AS2764i]
>
On Sat, Nov 06, 2021 at 10:38:39AM +0100, Simon Ruderich wrote:
> The option was removed in d15b0b0a ("BGP redesign", 2016-12-07) but the
> documentation wasn't updated.
Thanks, will merge.
--
Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo
Ondrej 'Santiago' Zajicek (email: santi...@crfreenet.org)
OpenPGP
On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 09:38:31PM +0100, Jan Prukner wrote:
>
> Hello everybody,
>
> my name is Jan, I am a backend developer. I'd like to get to know BIRD's
> codebase.
>
> My main motivation is to improve my C language skills. I used BIRD some time
> ago and am interested in networking.
>
On Sat, Nov 13, 2021 at 08:03:52AM +0100, Lukas Haase wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is probably fairly trivial but how can I tell bird (or Linux) that
> "connected routes" should have higher precedence than the routes from OSPF
> (even if they may be more specific)?
>
> I have the following issue:
On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 02:34:57PM +0100, keyvan ghadimi wrote:
> export where:
> we already have one BGP, and want to import its origin routes into our
> OSPF. so we still need to write another export policy?
Import/export are per protocol/channel and from point-of-view of the
routing table.
On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 09:12:38AM +0100, keyvan ghadimi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have Three routers in my network like the below diagram.
> RTR01 has a BGP to RTR02 and RTR02 has an OSPF to RTR03. I wrote a filter
> to redistribute origin routes from BGP protocol to OSPF in RTR02 but it's
> not
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 02:31:56PM +0300, Kseniya Blashchuk wrote:
> Hello!
> After upgrading to 2.0 I have noticed that "bgp on" in BGP peer
> configuration creates a separate BFD session, however it wasn't like that
> in bird 1.6, we had to specify neighbors in BFD section. Now for bird 2.0
> it
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 06:53:20AM +0200, Tiago Felipe Goncalves wrote:
> Hello,
>
> >From Bird doc:
> "BIRD offers crude automatic re-validating of affected routes after RPKI
> update, see option rpki reload.
> ...
> In contrast to to other filter operators, this status for the same route may
On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 03:38:47AM +1100, bir...@sensation.net.au wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I want to broadcast a last-resort old-school default route via RIPv1. The
> following config works:
>
> filter default_route {
> if net ~ [ 0.0.0.0/0 ] then {
> accept;
> }
> reject;
> }
> #
On Sat, Oct 23, 2021 at 01:38:37PM +0200, Maximilian Wilhelm wrote:
> > Why does no protocol in Bird want to take responsibility for the router's
> > own connectivity?
> > How on earth is this supposed to work?
>
> OSPF does that :)
>
> I would propose a configuration for R1 like
>
> protocol
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 02:47:12PM +0200, Alarig Le Lay wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue 19 Oct 2021 13:48:53 GMT, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > You use route from Direct protocol exported to OSPF. Contrary to other
> > protocols, default value of 'check
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 05:33:03AM +0200, Lukas Haase wrote:
> Hi Ondrej,
>
> > On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 07:49:09AM +0200, Lukas Haase wrote:
> > > I have googled like crazy but haven't found both pages yet.
> > > Maybe I should use DuckDuckGo finally.
> > > While those didn't fix the problem yet
On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 07:55:08PM +0200, Kees Meijs | Nefos wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> First of all: I'm very sorry if this has been discussed before.
>
> Anyway, we're experiencing possible (configuration) incompatibiliy between
> BIRD2 and Mikrotik RouterOS. To be precise, we're on BIRD 2.0.7 and
On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 07:49:09AM +0200, Lukas Haase wrote:
> I have googled like crazy but haven't found both pages yet.
> Maybe I should use DuckDuckGo finally.
> While those didn't fix the problem yet they are helpful. Thanks!
>
> > Have you tried setting the type to 'ptmp' or 'ptp' instead
On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 12:35:20PM +0200, Alarig Le Lay wrote:
> Hello Ondrej,
>
> On Mon 18 Oct 2021 17:39:44 GMT, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 01:20:52PM +0200, Alarig Le Lay wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On one router I h
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 01:20:52PM +0200, Alarig Le Lay wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On one router I have an interface that used to be connected to another
> machine, so the state is NO-CARRIER:
> core01-arendal ~ # ip addr show enp1s0
> 2: enp1s0: mtu 1500 qdisc mq state DOWN
> group default qlen 1000
>
On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 05:06:41PM -0400, Ross Tajvar wrote:
> This worked, thank you!
>
> It may be better to throw a syntax error and refuse to load (or reload) the
> configuration than to just accept it but to log errors at runtime...after I
> made this change, my filter started rejecting all
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 02:01:07AM +0200, Lukas Haase wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am having big trouble getting Bird/OSPF working. I broke it down to a
> simple setup:
> Point-to-point wireguard link between Node1 (192.168.56.224/31) and Node2
> (192.168.56.225/31) using nbma.
> There were nothing but
y from
bgp_large_community is a member of set [(1,2,*)].
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 2:49 PM Ondrej Zajicek
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 10:00:58AM -0400, Brooks Swinnerton wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I was wondering if it's possible to
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 09:35:13AM +0200, Bastien Durel wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to use bird to replace ospfd on OpenBSD, but it seems to
> have a strange effect on the networking stack :(
>
> I've tried multiple times, from OpenBSD 6.6 to 6.9, with bird2 (2.0.8
> now)
>
> ...
>
> On
On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 11:04:28AM +0200, Blažej Krajňák wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I just found that neighbour router Mikrotik has the LSA in table. So I
> incorrectly mentioned that Bird2 is not advertising route. But that
> route does not appear in Mikrotik routing table. I compared the same
On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 11:18:04PM +0800, 智慧雨泽 wrote:
> Hi,
> I use ibgp to transport full tables in my network. iBGP delete my
> ASN but I use my ASN to identify my prefixes.
> So I added this code to my ibgp import filter
> if bgp_path ~ [= =] then {
>
On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 06:34:31PM +0300, Alexander Shikov wrote:
> Hello!
>
> RFC5575 and newer RFC8955 define validation procedure for flowspec
> routes received by BGP protocol. While testing flowspec in bird 2.0.8 I've
> found strange behavior:
>
> So the question, is feasibility check
On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 04:33:26PM +, Ponikierski, Grzegorz wrote:
> Thanks for providing that. I was thinking about the same but couldn't find it
> in the manual.
Yes, we should put it there.
> Additional question is do I see it correctly that bird in comparison to
> Cisco/Juniper does
On Sun, Sep 05, 2021 at 05:08:09PM -0400, Cody Doucette wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was able to achieve this with a few small custom changes to bird:
>
> https://github.com/cjdoucette/bird/commits/gatekeeper
>
> I don’t know if this ability has been added to the bird mainline since I
> did this.
Hi
On Sun, Aug 01, 2021 at 11:32:42PM +0800, 智慧雨泽 wrote:
> Hi,My configuration file can work normally on the wireguard tunnel, but GRE
> does not work.
>
> Server1
>
> 11: home_1_vpn: mtu 1280 qdisc noqueue
> state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000
>link/none
>inet 5.101.92.125/32 scope
On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 09:34:36AM +0100, Matthew Reeve wrote:
> Hi Ondrej,
>
> just wondering if you'd had a chance to look at this any further yet please?
Hi
Sorry, not yet. Will check it soon.
--
Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo
Ondrej 'Santiago' Zajicek (email: santi...@crfreenet.org)
On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 10:00:45AM +0300, Kseniya Blashchuk wrote:
> Hello!
> I could not find any information about default protocol preference values
> (administrative distance) for bird. Can anybody please help with it? Are
> there any default values for OSFP, BGP, static, etc.? Or is it better
On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 10:13:09AM +0300, Alexander Shikov wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Yesterday we noticed a strange behavior of Bird 1.6.8 with handling
> one IPv6 BGP route:
>
> >birdc6 show route for 2a09:8387::: all
> BIRD 1.6.8 ready.
> 2a09:8387:::/48 via 2001:7f8:63::f2 on bge0
On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 03:14:39PM -0400, Dave Johnson wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to get igp_metric to work for iBGP based on an OSPF
> metric.
>
>
> Here's my setup:
>
> I would like to make use of the iBGP igp_metric as a tie-breaker if
> BGP gets down that far in the route selection
201 - 300 of 1391 matches
Mail list logo
