On lun. 20 mars 19:24:24 2017, Tim Weippert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 04:14:14PM +0100, Alarig Le Lay wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have this configuration:
> >
> > function bgp_filter_customer_in (prefix customer_prefix) {
>
On jeu. 2 mars 19:23:10 2017, Keenan Tims wrote:
> You can accomplish this by setting `med metric on` in your BGP protocols,
> and set bgp_med in the import policy to affect which route is selected when
> localpref and as-path-length are the same.
Hi,
I tried this, but forgotten to set med
Hi,
I have an AS (204092) with two upstreams (174 and 198507). On some
cases, the AS path is the same on both peers. I would like to use 198507
over 174 only in this situation (so, no localpref).
If I read the documentation correctly, I have take of « Prefer routes
with lower internal distance
Hi,
I didn’t find any script to be executed on the router to monitor BGP
sessions on https://gitlab.labs.nic.cz/labs/bird/wikis/Related so I
wrote my own:
https://www.swordarmor.fr/monitoring-des-sessions-bgp-de-bird-via-nrpe.html
The explanations are in french, mainly because I’m french and
On mar. 19 sept. 22:32:34 2017, Alexander Demenshin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Any reason why 240.0.0.0/4+ routes are ignored by bird (1.6.3)?
>
> I have tried to blackhole this range in static protocol, but got this
> message.
>
> Attempts to manually add any kernel route from this range were silently
>
On jeu. 16 nov. 12:40:41 2017, Shurshuka wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am newbie in Bird & BGP so pardon my question:
>
> I have server and my own AS/IP's (/24).
> I get default from my provider.
> My provider has a lot of upstreams (different IP transit providers with there
> own AS).
> I want my
Hi,
Thanks for the clarifications :)
On lun. 15 janv. 16:56:12 2018, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> This is most likely a result of periodic scan of kernel routing table
> containing 680k routes of BGP feed. I measured it recently on FreeBSD 10
> to be about 2.4 s on relatively powerful hardware. Not
Hi,
I’m running bird 1.6.3 on FreeBSD 11.1-RELEASE.
I see many “I/O loop cycle” in my logs:
root@budic:~ # tail -F /var/log/messages | grep 'bird:'
Jan 12
Hi,
I run a bird daemon on a 11.1-RELEASE FreeBSD.
If I try to reload the configuration (even without modifying it), the
daemon crashes.
root@nominoe:~ # birdc
BIRD 1.6.3 ready.
bird> configure
Connection closed by server
In dmesg I see “pid 1132 (bird), uid 0: exited on signal 6 (core
On dim. 18 févr. 13:25:37 2018, Adam Król wrote:
> Does BIRD have any support for AS migration mechanism as mentioned in
> RFC7705 https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7705? Something like
>
Hi,
On mar. 21 août 14:48:49 2018, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> And do you have routes in BIRD? This output are routes from kernel, which
> are here regardless of BIRD.
I don’t have the routes for eth1 and brlxc in bird, as the ipv6 channel
is down.
The kernel1 protocol only imports the default
On mar. 21 août 15:02:06 2018, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> If you restart the protocol does the cahnnel became up? If you restart
> BIRD will the channel be started as down or up?
The channel is up after either a restart of the protocol or the entire
bird.
bird> restart direct1
direct1: restarted
On mar. 21 août 15:27:51 2018, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> So i guess you added the protocol and reconfigured BIRD? Or you added the
> protocol without 'ipv6' and then added 'ipv6' channel and reconfigured?
I added the protocol without any afi/safi (bird1 reflex) and then added
IPv6 channel and
Hi,
I would like to import interfaces routes in my bird instance, so I wrote
this into my configuration:
protocol direct {
ipv6;
}
But the channel is down when I look thought birdc:
bird> show protocols all direct1
Name Proto Table State Since Info
direct1
he route server.
>
>
> https://github.com/pierky/arouteserver/blob/master/examples/bird_hooks/bird4.conf
I set up a routes server some times ago, my configuration is explained
here:
https://www.swordarmor.fr/comment-monter-un-point-dechange-partie-technique-un-serveur-de-routes-avec-bird.html
--
Alarig Le Lay
Hi,
Why are you doing iBGP between your RS in an IXP context?
--
Alarig
Hi,
With bird1, I can know how much routes are used for each protocol just
by parsing birdc:
[alarig@nominoe ~]$ birdc show protocols all bgp_breizhix | grep 'Routes:'
Routes: 75 imported, 0 filtered, 4 exported, 73 preferred
With bird2, I don’t see this information:
[alarig@budic ~]$
Hello,
It’s a bug, see the archives (or the commits), it’s already patched in
master ;)
--
Alarig
Hi,
I added the upstream repo (deb http://bird.network.cz/debian/ stretch
main) because bird2 is not in the debian one (even with sid!) and I need
flowspec.
https://bird.network.cz/?get_doc=16=bird-6.html never mentions
RFC5575 while https://bird.network.cz/?get_doc=20=bird-6.html does.
But I’m
Hi Ondrej,
>From which URL can I fetch the code at this commit?
The “download” link on
https://gitlab.labs.nic.cz/labs/bird/commit/6e8fb66859a17b295cd9246264221a75cdbe6c55
is disabled.
--
Alarig
On mer. 6 févr. 15:51:56 2019, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> This depends on version/variant of autoconf tools. Older ones do not
> support --runstatedir. INSTALL instructions are intended for released
> tar.gz source, which contains configure generated by proper autoconf
> version.
>
> AFAIK autoconf
It looks good from there too:
asbr01-lab /usr/local/src/bird # birdc -s /run/bird.ctl
BIRD v2.0.3-12-g6e8fb668 ready.
bird> show protocols all "ospf_*"
Name Proto Table State Since Info
ospf_ipv4 OSPF master4up 15:16:22.978 Running
Channel ipv4
State:
Hi Vincent,
On mer. 6 févr. 17:17:17 2019, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 6 février 2019 16:47 +01, Ondrej Zajicek :
>
> If you are interested and Ondřej Surý doesn't mind, I can maintain
> backports for bird and bird2 on a debian.net domain for Debian and on
> Launchpad for Ubuntu, using the
Hi Ondrej,
On mar. 29 janv. 19:08:12 2019, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 05:27:27PM +0100, Alarig Le Lay wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Just FYI, I had the same issue with a BGP session today:
>
> BTW, it is possible that it is triggered by change/reconfig
Hi,
Just FYI, I had the same issue with a BGP session today:
bird> show protocols all bgp_netensia_ipv4
Name Proto Table State Since Info
bgp_netensia_ipv4 BGP---up 2019-01-19Established
Description:netensia
BGP state: Established
Hi,
I’ve set up an OSPF as an IGP to resolve the BGP next-hops on the routes
learned from eBGP sessions.
On one of my border routers (running FreeBSD), the counters are correct:
root@nominoe:~ # birdc 'show protocols all "ospf_*"'
BIRD 2.0.2 ready.
Name Proto Table State Since
On jeu. 24 janv. 10:51:21 2019, Christoffer Hansen wrote:
> On 24/01/2019 10:46, Christoffer Hansen wrote:
> > Have you setup any import filters for OSPF?
>
> Maybe export filters would be the trick?
I already have an import filter:
##
# OSPF #
##
Hi,
On mer. 19 juin 09:10:53 2019, Robert Sander wrote:
> Hi,
>
> our routers run on Debian stretch with bird 1.6.4 from
> bird.network.cz/debian.
>
> Yesterday I tried kernel 4.19 from backports.debian.org and ran into a
> weird issue with IPv6 BGP sessions:
>
> All Peerings reported "Error:
Hi,
I have a weird setup with a transit. My next-hop is 2a03:94e0:feff::
(with a multihop session) which is reachable via 2a03:94e0:17ff::1 which
is on-link on eno1. (your should already tear blood here)
So, when I establish the session, the next-hop couldn’t be resolved and
the route is marked
Hi,
On jeu. 12 sept. 14:59:15 2019, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> Perhaps by setting 'gw' directly in BGP import filter?
If I set 'gw' in the import filter, all the routes are filtered, and
still marked as unreachable in the output of 'show route all filtered
table master6'
I also tried to set
Hello,
It seems that bird can’t resolve the next-hop in that case. But there is
no issue when the next-hop is announced by OSPF.
bird> show route all for 45.91.127.1
Table master4:
45.91.127.0/24 unreachable [ibgp_hv02_ipv4 16:16:24.927 from
89.234.186.40] * (100/-) [i]
Type: BGP
Hi,
I have a setup with some routers:
++ ++ +---+
| close router 1 | | close router 2 | | far router|
| 45.91.126.233 | | 45.91.126.236 | | 45.91.126.235 |
++ ++ +---+
\ |
Hi,
On 18/11/2019 16:04, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 06:38:09PM +0100, Alarig Le Lay wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> bird> show route all 0.0.0.0/0
>> Table master4:
>> 0.0.0.0/0unicast [ospf_ipv4 12:15:31.798] I (150/30)
>> [8
Hi,
On 21/11/2019 17:46, Benedikt Neuffer wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On 21.11.19 17:09, Andrew Hearn wrote:
>> Sorry to bring up a fairly old thread...
>>
>> We believe we are seeing this problem too, since a Stretch->Buster
>> upgrade - was there a solution to this?
>>
>> Thanks
>
> The problem
On 03/12/2019 11:58, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> It's not unexpected. A cache entry is for a /128.
When I’m routing 80k prefixes I don’t want to have n /128 routes because
someone doesn’t have 1500 of MTU. Is their a way to disable this behaviour?
--
Alarig
On 02/12/2019 23:04, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> Just to be clear: I did forget this fact and therefore my initial
> recommendation to increase max_size with more than 4096 active hosts
> does not apply anymore (as long as you have a 4.2+ kernel). Keep the
> default value and watch
On mar. 3 déc. 09:40:31 2019, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> So, there is 0x56 entries in the cache. Isn't that clear? :)
>
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/net/ipv6/route.c#L6006
I did a quick test on some routers:
core01-arendal, no fullview, on my own ASN, no so much traffic, using
On 03/12/2019 14:16, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> The information needs to be stored somewhere.
Why has it to be stored? It’s not really my problem if someone else has
a non-stantard MTU and can’t do TCP-MSS or PMTUd.
--
Alarig
PM GMT+01:00, Alarig Le Lay
> wrote:
>>On 03/12/2019 14:16, Vincent Bernat wrote:
>>> The information needs to be stored somewhere.
>>
>>Why has it to be stored? It’s not really my problem if someone else
>has
>>a non-stantard MTU and can’t do TCP-MSS or PMTUd.
&g
Hi,
On dim. 8 déc. 22:42:27 2019, keksbg wrote:
> Hello, I need some help with my BIRD configuration file. I currently
> cannot figure out how to fix this issue (I'm a newbie!) and most of the
> other people that I know that use BIRD haven't been able to help me. So
> here I am.
>
> Error:
Hi,
On 16/10/2019 12:17, Twana Othman wrote:
> Dears,
>
> I am new in BIRD route server and I configured a bgp with upstream and I
> want to verify the prefixes that I am send to my peer.
>
> So, anyone can guide me how to do this verification ?
>
> --
> Regards
> Twana
bird> show route
On sam. 30 nov. 23:50:48 2019, Alarig Le Lay wrote:
> We are using “Intel Corporation 82576 Gigabit Network Connection” NICs.
And “Broadcom Limited NetXtreme II BCM5709 Gigabit Ethernet”, sorry I
forgot this box.
--
Alarig
019 at 6:48 PM Alarig Le Lay wrote:
> >
> > On jeu. 21 nov. 18:12:17 2019, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> > > Perhaps try kernel 5.2.x or 5.3.x from buster-backports?
> >
> > I’m very interested by test results from newer kernels than 5.0.x
> >
> > --
> > Alarig
On sam. 30 nov. 23:31:39 2019, Frederik Kriewitz wrote:
> We don't know if this might be NIC related yet. We're seeing it happen
> with Intel X710 NICs (With all offloading features disabled). Which
> NICs are you using?
We are using “Intel Corporation 82576 Gigabit Network Connection” NICs.
--
Hi Vincent,
On lun. 2 déc. 21:38:21 2019, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> For IPv6, this is the size of the routing cache. If you have more than
> 4096 active hosts, Linux will aggressively try to run garbage
> collection, eating CPU. In this case, increase both
> net.ipv6.route.max_size and
On jeu. 21 nov. 18:12:17 2019, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> Perhaps try kernel 5.2.x or 5.3.x from buster-backports?
I’m very interested by test results from newer kernels than 5.0.x
--
Alarig
Hello,
On jeu. 3 oct. 21:07:00 2019, Christoph wrote:
> - security: no privilege dropping on BSD
regis ~ # ps aux | grep bird
root 31131 4.2 3.6 607704 602720 ? Ss Apr05 10956:29
/usr/sbin/bird -s /run/bird.ctl -c /etc/bird.conf -P /run/bird.pid
root 31209 0.0 0.0 7572
On sam. 21 déc. 00:39:43 2019, Nico Schottelius wrote:
> I have had a look at OSPF, but for our relatively simple network it
> looks like an overkill. Do you have any other recommendations for
> what to run the IGP with instead?
>
> The main reason I so far tried to stay on iBGP only is to reduce
Hi,
On ven. 20 déc. 22:36:29 2019, Nico Schottelius wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I was wondering about how bird solves the following problem with next
> hop self enabled:
>
> R1 <> R2
> \ /
> \ /
>upstream 1
>
> So both routers receive the same routes from
Hi Stavros,
On ven. 28 févr. 12:41:24 2020, Stavros Konstantaras wrote:
> Hi Bird community,
>
> We are investigating a weird customer issue regarding our Bird Route
> Servers (version 1.6.3) and a specific IPv6 session. Customer reports
> a sudden drop of his IPv6 session and -until now- we
Hi,
I followed the instructions from
https://bird.network.cz/?download=debian/ however the GPG isn’t
recognised.
root@hv03:~# curl -s https://bird.network.cz/debian/apt.key | apt-key add -
OK
root@hv03:~# cat /etc/apt/sources.list.d/bird.list
deb https://bird.network.cz/debian/ buster main
On mar. 11 févr. 18:27:43 2020, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-02-11 at 18:18 +0100, Alarig Le Lay wrote:
> > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do
> > not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender
> > and kno
Hi,
On mar. 11 févr. 17:52:29 2020, Bastien Durel wrote:
> 7: wg4b: mtu 1420 state UNKNOWN qlen 1000
> inet6 fe80::3/128 scope link
>valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
> 8: wg4a: mtu 1420 state UNKNOWN qlen 1000
> inet6 fe80::3/128 scope link
>valid_lft forever
t; - Daniel
>
> On 2/18/20 1:12 PM, Alarig Le Lay wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I followed the instructions from
> > https://bird.network.cz/?download=debian/ however the GPG isn’t
> > recognised.
> >
> > root@hv03:~# curl -s https://bird.network.c
On sam. 11 janv. 18:08:37 2020, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> Hi
>
> Yes, DNS resolving for IPv6 is broken in released versions, see this patch:
>
> https://gitlab.labs.nic.cz/labs/bird/commit/4e23b499696da81acf0ed5ad181573b94ccdb9a3
Thanks a lot, I’ve generated a diff for 2.0.7 from git and
Hi,
I have this configuration:
asbr02 ~ # cat /etc/bird.conf.d/protocol_rpki/*
protocol rpki rpki_alarig {
roa4 { table r4; };
roa6 { table r6; };
#remote "msi.no.swordarmor.fr";
remote 2a0e:f42::1;
}
protocol rpki rpki_conan {
roa4 { table r4; };
Hi,
it seems that for bird, the flowspec destination prefix is mentatory. I
have a session with an exabgp and if I send this
echo 'announce flow route { match { source 213.167.241.55/32;
destination 0.0.0.0/0; } then { discard; } }' > /var/run/exabgp.cmd
It works, I have the route:
On Sun 19 Apr 2020 20:42:21 GMT, Fabiano D'Agostino wrote:
> Thanks!
> But can I also use birdc to check rejected prefixes?
If you add a community, it will be visible with `show route all
filtered`
> Anyway why do you suggest to use bgp_path.last_noaggregated?
Because you don’t want to check
On Tue 21 Apr 2020 18:08:17 GMT, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> Hi
>
> See https://bird.network.cz/pipermail/bird-users/2020-February/014220.html
>
> Fixed in commit 78e4a123bb937bb45f7eaebb0ea475095443bfd0
I didn’t see the previous message, sorry. I made a package based on this
commit and it works,
On Fri 01 May 2020 21:12:10 GMT, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> On Fri, May 01, 2020 at 07:46:54PM +0200, Alarig Le Lay wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > It’s the first time I try to do such a configuration, but I can’t find
> > the right syntax.
> >
> > route 2a00:5884
or, unexpected INTERFACE
route 2a00:5884:105::/48 via fe80::ae1f:6bff:fead:2ed8 "enp3s0f1.30"
→ syntax error, unexpected TEXT
And https://bird.network.cz/?get_doc=20=bird-6.html#ss6.14 only
shows examples about IPv4.
What is the correct syntax?
Thanks,
--
Alarig Le Lay
Hi,
I recently upgraded from 4.19.97 to 5.4.28 and I noticed that bird was
using a lot more CPU (about three times).
On those two graphs you can see the CPU usage and when I rebooted:
https://pix.milkywan.fr/gallery#ugO0qVvx.png,ncr9kHfi.png
I rebooted to 4.19.113 and now I’m back to the ~10 %
s community from the
filters, but we do not receive it on the other side (tried with another
BIRD too).
Is it an expected behaviour or am I missing something obvious there?
Thanks,
--
Alarig Le Lay
Thanks also for the advices on the configuration. It dates from some
times ago now and has endured many modifications ;)
Kind regards,
--
Alarig Le Lay
working. Is it known that for the ipv6 the RPKI
> channeling is not compatible, you guys?
>
> Thanks a lot in advance!
>
> Cheers!
> Irene
You may have hit the same bug as me, this commit fixed it.
https://gitlab.labs.nic.cz/labs/bird/-/commit/4e23b499696da81acf0ed5ad181573b94ccdb9a3
Regards,
--
Alarig Le Lay
I wrongly pasted your errors, but 78.150.32.0/20 and 78.150.44.0/22 are
the correct ones.
--
Alarig
On Sat 10 Oct 2020 22:05:45 GMT, Fabiano D'Agostino wrote:
> How does roa_check(roa_table,net,bgp_path.last) work?
> Having such a ROA as example:
> origin AS: 64513
> prefix: 78.150.40.0/20
> max mask: 24
>
> and a BGP announcement:
> origin AS: 64514
> prefix: 78.150.45.0/22
>
> so it's as
Hi Sasha,
On Sun 02 Aug 2020 17:36:13 GMT, Sasha Romijn wrote:
> protocol kernel {
> scan time 20;
> ipv4 {
> export all;
> import none;
> };
> }
I think that the issue is there, you’re not importing routes from the
kernel, so bird doesn’t know that they exist, but
Hi,
On 06/07/2020 13:03, Skyler Mäntysaari wrote:
> protocol ospfv3 main {
It’s `protocol ospf v3 main`. E.g. from one of my routers:
protocol ospf v3 ospf_ipv6 {
ipv6 {
import all;
import keep filtered;
import limit 200 action block;
ry release algorithms, anyway all of
> this magic is mostly just a cargo cult.
>
> Maria
>
> On 1/25/21 8:08 AM, Alarig Le Lay wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On one of my routers, I needed to free some RAM temporally, so I shut
> > all my BGP sessions. Wit
Hi,
On one of my routers, I needed to free some RAM temporally, so I shut
all my BGP sessions. With `birdc show memory` I saw that it should have
worked, however htop was still seeing 1.2G used by bird.
5311 root 20 0 1296M 1220M 1724 S 0.0 61.1 59h01:29 ├─
/usr/sbin/bird -s
Thanks a lot for the new release!
I’ve upgraded a RR and a router, the build and the restart didn’t hit
any issue so far.
Cheers,
--
Alarig
Hi,
Just FYI, I pushed it to the gentoo tree:
https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/20196
Alarig
On Wed 24 Mar 2021 07:03:57 GMT, Skyler Mäntysaari wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Who is responsible for the Debian packages at the moment?
> I couldn't find the build scripts for those at gitlab.nic.cz and
.
The router has an uptime 147 days, so bird was pretty close to that. I’m
running a 4.14.x kernel.
Regards,
--
Alarig Le Lay
,
--
Alarig Le Lay
Hi,
On Tue 19 Oct 2021 13:48:53 GMT, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> Hi
>
> You use route from Direct protocol exported to OSPF. Contrary to other
> protocols, default value of 'check link' option for Direct protocol is
> 'no'. Just enable it:
>
>
Hello Ondrej,
On Mon 18 Oct 2021 17:39:44 GMT, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 01:20:52PM +0200, Alarig Le Lay wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On one router I have an interface that used to be connected to another
> > machine, so the state is NO-CARRIER:
>
the
route rather than keeping it into OSPF.
Regards,
--
Alarig Le Lay
is stable. Before, the logs were
flooded within an hour.
On Fri 24 Sep 2021 23:29:25 GMT, Alarig Le Lay wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Now that the IPv6 bug is supposed to be resolved since 5.8, I tried to
> upgrade a router from 4.14 to 5.10
>
> Bird starts, however while inserting routes t
Hello,
I tried the snapshot of 2.0.9 (git hash
71c9484b00b4428ae6c7d7c8eea6d96073683a54) and I don’t have any netlink
error messages on 5.x anymore. The exact version is 5.15.23-gentoo.
On Sat 10 Oct 2020 15:32:58 GMT, Sasha Romijn wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I narrowed it down to being introduced in
will test it on old kernels too, and if it works, I’m planning to
include it in the gentoo package.
On Sat 19 Feb 2022 01:44:43 GMT, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 19, 2022 at 12:44:11AM +0100, Alarig Le Lay wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I gave t
On Thu 24 Mar 2022 07:43:03 GMT, Douglas Fischer wrote:
> I know that it is not the focus of your question, and also is not the focus
> on this mail list, but...
>
> To that kind of automation, the best BGP engine you will find is ExaBGP. It
> is not focuses in been in compliance with all the
On Fri 03 Jun 2022 17:40:23 GMT, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> 3) If someone use that on Linux, could send me output of 'ip address show'
> for these ifaces?
I’m using vrrp on linux, with the macvlan option to be compatible with
cisco.
Inactive router:
asbr02 ~ # ip a sh enp3s0f1.30
12:
Hello,
On Fri 21 Apr 2023 09:20:29 GMT, Ondrej Filip wrote:
> Dear BIRD Users,
> we're presenting you a new alpha version of the Multithreaded BIRD.
> Contrary to the previous version, you have to set your desired number
> of threads in config by the threads N; option.
>
> Version 3.0alpha1
Hello,
I have two OSPF protocols, one for IPv4 and one for IPv6. I’ve set the
lo interface for both, but it only shows up for IPv4:
protocol ospf ospf_ipv4 {
merge external;
ipv4 {
import all;
import keep filtered;
import limit 200
On Mon 06 May 2024 18:02:28 GMT, Bastien Durel wrote:
> If I remember well, you must have a link-local address on the interface
> for it to be taken in account.
I confirm:
edge03-stolon ~ # ip a sh dev lo
1: lo: mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group
default qlen 1000
link/loopback
86 matches
Mail list logo
