Hello,
On 01/22/2018 04:16 PM, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> Or you can use new Large communities, which are fully 32bit, and ditch
> both traditional and Extended communities. But this is pretty new
> standard and i am not sure how widely is supported by other systems.
Not yet, and if they're supporte
Hello,
as Ondrej mentioned already, you have wrong basic network setup - you're
using wrong network masks. H0 thinks, that all nodes (H1, H2, H3) ale in
single directly-connected L2 network.
To have BGP working, you need to have basic L3 connectivity working -
that means, you must be able to ping
Hello,
"preference" attribute can be used for this purpose (don't be confused
by "local preference" used in BGP, it's another attribute)..
With regards,
Daniel
On 04/16/2018 03:56 AM, Derek Pan wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> I want to implement the AD (administrative distance) function like cisco
>
There's quite good article discussing that:
https://b4ldr.wordpress.com/2014/09/06/dummies-link-local-and-the-loop-back/
On 04/27/2018 10:52 AM, Wilhelm Schuster wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I’m learning about IP-networking and am in the process of setting up a Linux
> router using bird. During my research
Hello,
that's expected behavior of BGP. There's extension to BGP described in
RFC 7911 allowing multiple paths to be advertised to eBGP peers, in Bird
you can try "add paths" configuration option (but this also requires
capabality support on other side).
With regards,
Daniel
On 8/21/18 12:05 PM,
Hello,
I think sorting should not be limited only to "show routes" output. Also
other show commands needs to be sorted in human-readable order (like
show protocols, show bfd sessions etc). In large-scale deployments (like
IXP route-servers, where you're also have limited commands available
within l
nce degradation.
Unsorted route output is main problem, but I also pointed, that there're
other "show" commands, where sorted listing might be useful in some
cases from operator's perspective.
With regards,
Daniel
On 10/18/18 1:34 PM, Maria Jan Matějka wrote:
>
>
> On Oc
It was discussed here in May, .deb packages are promised to be released
with upcoming version.
See https://bird.network.cz/pipermail/bird-users/2018-May/012349.html
On 11/28/18 6:13 PM, marcelo henrique wrote:
> I would like upgrade bird, in moment i am using bird 1.6 with ubuntu.
>
> Someone al
Hi,
in general is good practice to null-route packet with unused destination
IP for address space assigned to your network. That's done by statement
you sent.
You can define multiple protocols in config file, including static one
(typically definition is based on it's purpose).
- Daniel
On 12/3/
Hello,
On 1/9/19 11:38 PM, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> We plan to release distribution packages for 2.0.3 and 1.6.5 like we
> released for previous 1.6.x (i.e. primarily for Debian and Fedora, not
> sure if Debian one also works in Ubuntu). It is just not synced with
> our source code release, hopeful
Hello,
On 2/7/19 4:09 PM, Ondrej Filip wrote:> This is not necessary. BIRD does
not check the first AS unless this is
> configured in filters.
I think this behavior mightt be reconsidered for eBGP peers for upcoming
versions, mainly due to security reasons.
Even RFC 4271 isn't strict here for le
Hello,
I'm running bird 1.6.x branch (packages from Debian/Buster; currently
1.6.6) on recent 4.19 custom-build kernels without any issues (on armhf
hardware).
My BGP sessions are carrying only few routes (default + some more
specifics).
One idea that comes in my mind is default kernel limit for
try this: $ apt-key adv --keyserver ha.pool.sks-keyservers.net
--recv-keys B188E2B695BD4743
More informations are here -
https://www.patreon.com/posts/dpa-new-signing-25451165
- Daniel
On 2/18/20 1:12 PM, Alarig Le Lay wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I followed the instructions from
> https://bird.network.cz/
Use:
$ apt-key adv --keyserver ha.pool.sks-keyservers.net
--recv-keys B188E2B695BD4743
It was discussed on this list last month...
https://bird.network.cz/pipermail/bird-users/2020-February/014246.html
On 3/5/20 12:13 PM, Petr Boltík wrote:
> Hi, please check pubkey for your debian repository. No
Hello,
commercial BGP implementations (Juniper, Nokia, Cisco) usually
implements silent saturation based on your point (2) in such cases,
Quagga does this too (see route_value_adjust function [1]; which handles
these overflows). It's not limited to locpref, also other attibutes can
be modified
Hello,
it's know issue, you have to import proper key (which is not mentioned
on bird.network.cz; packages are signed by Ondrej Sury's key; he also
maintains official Debian package currently).
This should help:
$ apt-key adv --keyserver ha.pool.sks-keyservers.net
--recv-keys B188E2B695BD4743
Hello,
On 3/4/22 18:38, Douglas Fischer wrote:
I'm not a great connoisseur of Juniper's portfolio, and I still don't
really know what this “junos rs-16” is.
on
https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/day-one-books/DO_BGPSharding.pdf
is document describing how is multithreading handled in
It's not first time build failed (due to similar error), see
https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=bird2&arch=armel for example.
Increasing BT_TIMEOUT in test/birdtest.h might help.
- Daniel
On 6/28/22 14:03, Maria Matejka wrote:
Hello!
On 6/28/22 1:42 PM, Jakub Ružička wrote:
Hello
Hello,
when we're talking about flowspec, we should keep in mind that another
possible address families exists already, while extending Bird. The code
should be more general - there're more AFI's comming from IETF (even
they're in draft phase currently).
With regards,
Daniel
On 10.6.2015 15:04,
Hello,
when I'm using prebuilt packages from your CI [1], I noticed issue with
Bird 3.0alpha2 startup using provided systemd unit, but only when BFD
protocol is enabled (but, for example BGP or static protocols weren't
affected). This isn't happening with version 2.13 [2], which uses
similar u
invalid pointer usage caused by
missing else.
Here you can download new packages to check it for yourself.
https://gitlab.nic.cz/labs/bird/-/pipelines/112818
Maria
On 5/13/23 13:59, Daniel Suchy via Bird-users wrote:
Hello,
when I'm using prebuilt packages from your CI [1], I noticed
There's internet draft describing in detail, why it's not a good idea to
store RPKI validation state inside community variables at all..
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-sidrops-avoid-rpki-state-in-bgp-00.html
- Daniel
On 4/27/24 5:05 AM, Nigel Kukard via Bird-users wrote:
Hi all,
22 matches
Mail list logo
