>
> Maria
>
>
> On 20 June 2023 20:20:50 CEST, Erin Shepherd
> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I run bird on a system which uses systemd as a service supervisor, and would
>> like to implement graceful restart in a way which works well with it.
>>
>&g
Bird only treats the interfaces enslaved to the VRF as part of the VRF, but not
the VRF virtual interface itself. This means that e.g. OSPF won't pick up
loopback addresses defined on the VRF interface itself. You have to
additionally add a dummy interfaces with the IPs attached, which seems to
Hello,
I run bird on a system which uses systemd as a service supervisor, and would
like to implement graceful restart in a way which works well with it.
In particular, what I'd like to do is:
• If I restart the bird service (e.g. for an upgrade), Bird performs a
graceful restart
• If I
It's a bit non-obvious, but you can do this with a loop. For example we
basically replicate the Euro-IX routeserver announcement control communities
inside our network, and we use the following function to translate them when
exporting routes to a (supporting) route server
# Translate Euro-IX
Spitballing slightly here, but could you avoid this problem by adding
0.0.0.0/0+ ::0/0+ AS0 RoAs to the table and accepting ROA Unknowns?
Obviously the disadvantage here is that if your IRR RTR server goes down you're
basically unfiltered, but it at least avoids the availability problem
- Erin
On Sat, 18 Nov 2023, at 03:19, Daniel Gröber wrote:
> Hi Alexander,
>
> On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 12:57:26PM +0100, Alexander Zubkov wrote:
> > But as I understood the technology, it works only in one way (for
> > outgoing packets) and the decapsulation should be processed separately,
> > for
I guess it might not fit with bird's abstractions (or perhaps the Babel
protocol), but has thought been given to using SO_TIMESTAMPING to have the
kernel compute TX/RX timestamps?
- Erin
On Sat, 13 Apr 2024, at 16:14, Maria Matejka via Bird-users wrote:
> Hello Stephanie, Toke and list,
>
>
It seems absent from the BSDs, but on Linux you can pass the MSG_MORE flag to
send() to override TCP_NODELAY for a specific write
On Wed, 15 May 2024, at 19:40, Job Snijders via Bird-users wrote:
> Dear Marco,
>
> On Wed, 15 May 2024 at 19:27, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>> On May 15, Job Snijders via
the
buffers is easy so they can then be passed to sendmsg(), then you may as well
do that.
(And of course you can combine both techniques)
- Erin
On Thu, 16 May 2024, at 01:32, Job Snijders wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 09:09:47PM +0200, Erin Shepherd wrote:
> > It seems absent from
