Hi.
I have a bunch of bird routers. Recently I discovered that at least one
prefix from LSADB isn't installed in FIB:
(first here's what bird thinks about it)
# birdc
BIRD 1.4.4 ready.
bird> show ospf lsadb lsid 192.168.114.192
Global
Type LS ID Router Age Sequence
Hi/
On 08.12.2015 14:53, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 11:28:00AM +0500, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> I have a bunch of bird routers. Recently I discovered that at least one
>> prefix from LSADB isn't installed in FIB:
> Hi
>
> Co
Hi,
On 08.12.2015 14:53, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 11:28:00AM +0500, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> I have a bunch of bird routers. Recently I discovered that at least one
>> prefix from LSADB isn't installed in FIB:
> Hi
>
> Co
Hi.
On 08.12.2015 18:23, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 06:10:20PM +0500, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
>> I've also noticed that this prefix is missing from 'show ospf state'
>> output files, but present in 'show ospf state all' output files, but
>> al
Hi.
On 08.12.2015 18:23, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 06:10:20PM +0500, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
>> I've also noticed that this prefix is missing from 'show ospf state'
>> output files, but present in 'show ospf state all' output files, but
>> al
Hi.
I have lots of messages in one of my bird's logfile:
Dec 10 18:20:50 wizard bird: ospfv4: LSA ID collision for 172.16.1.194/31
They are about different LSA id.
What do they mean exactly ? Does it mean some of my routers have
identical networks configured ?
Thanks.
Eugene.
Hi,
Recenly I occasionally found that one can define the OSPF area twice, like
area 0.0.0.1 {
interface "eth0";
}
area 0.0.0.1 {
interface "eth1";
}
And this obviously erroneous configuration passes the bird configuration
check, and starts causing unpredictable and wierd problems,
Hello,
I have a bird router serving multiple BGP sessions with my AS uplinks,
and now I need to create a more complicated thing, - I have several FIBs
and I need to reorder the BGP link preference for a given FIB. Say, I
have 3 uplinks, A/B/C, A is the most preferable one for default FIB, but
: Eugene M. Zheganin <mailto:e...@norma.perm.ru>> napisał(a):
Hello,
I have a bird router serving multiple BGP sessions with my AS
uplinks,
and now I need to create a more complicated thing, - I have
several FIBs
and I need to reorder the BGP link preference for a
Hello,
Since the documentation doesn't specify the exact output format, could
anyone please explain it to me ?
0.0.0.0/0 via 192.168.57.60 on re0 [ospfv4 11:17:31] ! E2
(150/10/1) [192.168.100.254]
via 90.150.180.20 on ng0 [kernel1 11:12:08] (10)
I
Hello,
I want to log all protocols state changes, and I have a question:
debug all { states }
is valid in birdc, but why
debug all {
states
};
is invalid in bird.conf ?
Thanks.
Eugene.
Hello,
11.03.2019 21:02, Ondrej Zajicek пишет:
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 08:41:19PM +0500, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
Hello,
I want to log all protocols state changes, and I have a question:
debug all { states }
is valid in birdc, but why
debug all {
states
};
is invalid in bird.conf
Hello,
If I have pipe between two kernel routing tables, which, in turn, are
filled with two different BGP protocols, when these routes are exported
from kernel FIB via pipe, do they retain their BGP attributes like BGP
preference ? Or, if this question is more clear, does the following
Hello.
I have a bunch of birder routers, and the troublesome router is
connected to some of them via LAN and to some of them via WAN tunnels.
For some reason it always chooses a WAN route, regardless of it's metric:
===Cut===
bird> show route for 10.50.3.0/24
10.50.3.0/24 via
On 07.04.2020 19:06, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 06:41:37PM +0500, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
Hello.
I have a bunch of birder routers, and the troublesome router is connected to
some of them via LAN and to some of them via WAN tunnels.
For some reason it always chooses a WAN
Hello,
How do I redistribute static routes into OSPF ? Suppose I have this:
protocol static {
route 10.101.6.61/32 via 172.16.0.70;
}
If the export filter will allow this route into OSPF, the neighbor will
receive it with this very next-hop, and in the absense of direct
connectivity
Hello,
I'm running Bird 2.0.11 on FreeBSD 13.2, I also have a number of bird
2.0.x in local network. For a number of reasons I need the interface the
OSPF is bound to to be in non-default FIB.
As soon as I put it there, I'm starting to get the periodic errors like
===Cut===
ospfv4: Socket
Hello,
I have a peculiar VPN client that I want to redistributes the routes
from. Technically it creates a tun0 interface and
attaches all the routes it's connected to as it's own on-interface
routes pointing to it's own IP (yeah, I know it's la
me, but seems like it's written by Windows 98
Hello,
youm this question was asked like a gazillion times, but so far I faled
to google the answer. So, I have a network softrouter on Linux which was
clearly written by some ignorant folks; it operates the p2p tunX
interface that doesn't have the remote IP set, only a local one. So bird
Hello,
On 11.01.2024 03:44, Alexander Zubkov wrote:
As far as I remember, if you set the interface in a filter, than the gw is
undefined automatically.
Yep, checked the documentation, and here it is:
https://bird.network.cz/?get_doc=20=bird-5.html#ss5.5
string ifname
Name of the
Hello,
On 11.01.2024 13:29, Alexander Zubkov wrote:
You mean exporting to the kernel? You can alter the routes in input
filters. Or pipe routes to another table, altering them in the pipe export
filter, and then export to the kernel from that other table.
Nope, I need quite the opposite - I
21 matches
Mail list logo
