On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 05:12:47PM +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> Ondrej Zajicek writes:
> > Hi
> >
> > Finally, i get some time to read through the patch. I have some questions:
> >
> > 1) Why the retractions with ACK req are sent as unicast? IMHO the
> > specification allows both unicast
Ondrej Zajicek writes:
> On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 10:25:56PM +0100, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>> Toke Høiland-Jørgensen writes:
>>
>> > In order to prevent routing loops, Babel installs temporary blackhole
>> > routes to prefixes that expire or are otherwise lost. These blackhole
>> > routes
On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 10:25:56PM +0100, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> Toke Høiland-Jørgensen writes:
>
> > In order to prevent routing loops, Babel installs temporary blackhole
> > routes to prefixes that expire or are otherwise lost. These blackhole
> > routes are maintained for a while to e
Ondrej Zajicek writes:
> On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 10:25:56PM +0100, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>> > This patch implements the above behaviour. It adds a generic facility to
>> > the Babel protocol which allows for sending sequences of acknowledgement
>> > requests to a number of neighbours, and
On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 10:25:56PM +0100, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> > This patch implements the above behaviour. It adds a generic facility to
> > the Babel protocol which allows for sending sequences of acknowledgement
> > requests to a number of neighbours, and executing a callback function
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen writes:
> In order to prevent routing loops, Babel installs temporary blackhole
> routes to prefixes that expire or are otherwise lost. These blackhole
> routes are maintained for a while to ensure the route has been flushed
> from the whole network; the default hold time i
