On 08/27/2015 09:39 AM, prabhat via bitcoin-dev wrote:
Fine point.
So where is the solution? What to do?
How about nothing.
___
bitcoin-dev mailing list
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Fine point.
So where is the solution? What to do?
Prabhat Kumar Singh
Prabhat Kumar Singh
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 6:58 PM, Gavin Andresen gavinandre...@gmail.com
wrote:
Have you talked with anybody at the Bitcoin Foundation about this proposal?
As Chief Scientist of the Foundation, I am
So where is the solution? What to do?
AML-KYC is mostly something that sits on top of the Bitcoin protocol.
Take Coinase, inc. as an example. They check bank accounts before they
open your account and they link your Bitcoin address to your account in
their database. Then they ask for
So you mean that,
1. Govt agencies already know about everything and anything this subject
is about, but passively.
2. Due to passive nature, the actions are post incident and not pre. So
there is a risk of many ticking time-bombs which some JB (Jack Bauer or
James Bond or Jai
Proposal 1 does not deal with Tx fee. Proposal 2 does. According to
proposal 2, miners wont be able to increase or decrease Max Block Size only
by manipulating Tx fee. They have to manipulate...
i. Tx fee of ~4000 blocks.
ii. Block size of ~4000 blocks.
I never proposed *next block collects Tx
Guys,
I strongly think the original prabhat e-mail is a parody.
And I find very funny that important people have responded.
But maybe I'm wrong!
*:)*
El jue., 27 ago. 2015 a las 11:04, Chris Pacia via bitcoin-dev (
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org) escribió:
On 08/27/2015 09:39 AM,
I have been reading the pdf and one thing I can't figure out is what you
mean by most common floor. Is that the smallest block size that has a
vote or the block size with the most votes or something else?
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 10:40 AM Jeff Garzik jgar...@gmail.com wrote:
Great questions.
-
But money is attached to life and not liberty
I can't truly express in this email exactly how much I personally disagree
with that statement/belief because I don't think the dev mailing list is
the appropriate forum for such philosophical discussions.
I will say this, though: I think you've
Prabhat,
You write about OFAC, KYC, and AML.
The *Office of Foreign Assets Control* (*OFAC*) is a financial intelligence
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Financial_intelligence and enforcement
agency of the U.S. government charged with planning and execution of
economic and trade sanctions
I Truly respect your opinions.
Prabhat Kumar Singh
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 12:25 AM, Oliver Petruzel opetru...@gmail.com
wrote:
But money is attached to life and not liberty
I can't truly express in this email exactly how much I personally disagree
with that statement/belief because I
This BIP was assigned number 113.
I have updated the text accordingly and added credits to Gregory Maxwell.
Please see the changes in the pull request:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/182
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 1:57 AM, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
I posted a new draft of the proposal:
http://blockhawk.net/bitcoin-dev/bipwiki.html
The subsections still need to be fleshed out a bit more. I'd love any
comments or suggestions.
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015, 4:30 PM Eric Lombrozo elombr...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, the current type attribute needs
20th percentile, though there is some argument to take the 'mode' of
several tranches
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Andrew C achow...@gmail.com wrote:
I have been reading the pdf and one thing I can't figure out is what you
mean by most common floor. Is that the smallest block size that
I have changed BIPS 112 and 113 to reflect this amended deployment
strategy. I'm beginning to think the issues created by Bitcoin XT are
so serious it probably deserves converting OPs text into an
informational BIP.
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 6:42 PM, Mark Friedenbach via bitcoin-dev
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 11:08:32PM +0100, Btc Drak wrote:
This BIP was assigned number 113.
I have updated the text accordingly and added credits to Gregory Maxwell.
Please see the changes in the pull request:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/182
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 11:11:10PM
So I've created 2 new repositories with changed rules regarding
sequencenumbers:
https://github.com/maaku/bitcoin/tree/sequencenumbers2
This repository inverts (un-inverts?) the sequence number. nSequence=1
means 1 block relative lock-height. nSequence=LOCKTIME_THRESHOLD means 1
second relative
Mode could be ruled out immediately. Just consider this: 34% 8MB, 33%
1.5MB, 33% 1.2MB
I personally believe the median is the most natural and logical choice.
51% of miners can always force the 49% to follow the simple majority
choice through a 51% attack. Using median will eliminate the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Well,
On 08/27/2015 06:39 AM, prabhat via bitcoin-dev wrote:
Fine point.
So where is the solution? What to do?
You could study bitcoin some more and understand what it is instead of
proposing to implement AML-KYC in bitcoin which shows vast
I've done some work in this area. see http://coinvalidation.com/ it's
currently shelved due to lack of legal and regulatory framework.
1. this should not be directly implemented on the protocol level. I believe
its Jeff Garzik who once said stolen bitcoins is a legal problem, not a
technical one.
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 12:38:42PM +0930, Rusty Russell via bitcoin-dev wrote:
So I'd like an IsStandard() rule to say it nLockTime be 0 if an
nSequence != 0x. Would that screw anyone currently?
That sentence doesn't quite parse (say it nLockTime), so please
forgive me if I'm
I would prefer not to download an attachment.
Generally and without having the benefit of reading your document, AML and
or KYC requirements are treated on a jurisdiction by jurisdiction basis.
You would probably need to factor obtaining a universal agreement between
all of the governments and
Hi,
I am proposing to create a AML-KYC module to control the network and also
qualify use cases in OFAC compliant way.
Here is the attached doc.
Please provide your feedback and suggestions.
Best,
Prabhat Kumar Singh
Title: A AML KYC enforcement mechanism to regulate OFAC(and similar others)
Thanks for the comments and feedback.
I have previously read those threads as suggested by some members.
In relation with transactions, I do agree with suggestions that they should
be left on their own, and assumed that people would work in the best
interest of themselves and society. Everything
Very good, I can't wait to see it. Please code it up and submit a pull
request to github. Don't expect someone will do it for you.
prabhat via bitcoin-dev 於 2015-08-27 08:06 寫到:
snip.
Folks, suggest something, scrap my idea, but let's build something to
save this ecosystem, otherwise it
24 matches
Mail list logo
