On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 4:39 PM, Mark Friedenbach
wrote:
>
> > On Oct 1, 2017, at 12:41 PM, Russell O'Connor
> wrote:
> >
> > Creating a Bitcoin script that does not allow malleability is difficult
> and requires wasting a lot of bytes to do so, typically when handling
> issues around non-0-or-1
(Subject was: [bitcoin-dev] Version 1 witness programs (first draft)), but
I'm moving part of that conversation to this thread.
On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Johnson Lau wrote:
> 3. Do we want to allow static analysis of sigop?
> BIP114 and the related proposals are specifically designed to al
Op 2 okt. 2017, om 03:56 heeft Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev
het volgende geschreven:
>
> On Monday 02 October 2017 12:35:38 AM Mark Friedenbach wrote:
>>> b. OP_RETURNTRUE (Luke). I proposed this in an earlier version of BIP114
>>> but now I think it doesn’t interact well with signature aggregati
