Re: [bitcoin-dev] Few questions regarding ListTransaction

OK. Thank you guys for clarification. On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 1:00 PM, Karl-Johan Alm via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > Thanks for clarifying! > > On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 6:48 PM, ZmnSCPxj wrote: > > Good morning Karl-Johan Alm, > > > >

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Few questions regarding ListTransaction

Good morning Karl-Johan Alm, To clarify: Nothing prevents a miner from completely ignoring nSequence when putting transactions in blocks. Unconfirmed transactions are, by definition, not recorded in blocks. So if there is a transaction 0xFFF nSequence and fee 1000 satoshi, and another

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Few questions regarding ListTransaction

Thanks for clarifying! On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 6:48 PM, ZmnSCPxj wrote: > Good morning Karl-Johan Alm, > > To clarify: > > Nothing prevents a miner from completely ignoring nSequence when putting > transactions in blocks. > > Unconfirmed transactions are, by definition,

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Few questions regarding ListTransaction

On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 05:10:43PM +0900, Karl-Johan Alm wrote: > On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 4:52 PM, Peter Todd wrote: > > Or via full replace-by-fee, which appears to be used by a significant > > minority > > of miners: > > I was of the impression that final transactions

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Few questions regarding ListTransaction

On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 4:52 PM, Peter Todd wrote: > Or via full replace-by-fee, which appears to be used by a significant minority > of miners: I was of the impression that final transactions (sequence=0x) cannot be RBF'd.

Re: [bitcoin-dev] Few questions regarding ListTransaction

On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 02:22:42PM +0900, Karl-Johan Alm via bitcoin-dev wrote: > Clarification on one part below: > > On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 2:21 PM, Karl-Johan Alm > wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 5:29 AM, Maksim Solovjov via bitcoin-dev > >