>Under this point-of-view, then, extension block is "not" soft fork.
>It is "evil" soft fork since older nodes are forced to upgrade as their
>intended functionality becomes impossible.
>In this point-of-view, it is no better than a hard fork, which at least is
>very noisy about how older
Good morning ZmnSCPxj,
Thank you for your answer.
There is a position that fullnodes must be able to get a view of the UTXO set,
and extension blocks (which are invisible to pre-extension-block fullnodes)
means that fullnodes no longer have an accurate view of the UTXO set.
I think old nodes
Good morning Kenshiro,
> - Soft fork: old nodes see CT transactions as "sendtoany" transactions
There is a position that fullnodes must be able to get a view of the UTXO set,
and extension blocks (which are invisible to pre-extension-block fullnodes)
means that fullnodes no longer have an
On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 12:48:40AM +0800, Johnson Lau wrote:
> In a 3 parties channel, let’s say the balance for A, B, C is 2, 3, 6BTC
> respectively, there are few ways they could make the settlement tx.
The way I look at this is:
* you can have a "channel factory" of 3 or more members
