Good morning Alistair,
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, March 18, 2019 4:27 AM, Alistair Mann via bitcoin-dev
wrote:
> This update collects community feedback on my HTLB Pre-BIP
>
> As reminder, I'm suggesting a BIP for a hitherto poorly
Be advised that starting this week bitcoin-dev, lightning-dev and other
Bitcoin-oriented lists currently still active at
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo will begin migration to
the Linux Foundation's new list infrastructure operated by groups.io. You
may continue to use these
Hi,
I think Payjoin can be a very good privacy solution for Bitcoin, but I have a
question about it:
- If a user has 1 BTC in a single address and make a payjoin payment to other
person of 0.1 BTC using that address as input, the other person can see in a
blockchain explorer the change
Funding Transaction Pattern is how I name it; I am unaware if this pattern has
been named before.
I know gmax created Taproot precisely as an optimization of this pattern, so I
presume he is aware of it, and might know a proper name for such.
It is massively ambiguous to call it "gmax technique"
This update collects community feedback on my HTLB Pre-BIP
As reminder, I'm suggesting a BIP for a hitherto poorly supported class of
transactions: "Good Behaviour Bonds".
1. On this mailing list:
ZmnSCPxj notes HTLB over HTLC can improve privacy by obscuring whether a
transaction is, in fact,
Many thanks for your thoughts, ZmnSCPxj.
> I believe there is indeed an important usecase for HTLB over HTLC, which is
> to improve the anonymity set. An HTLB over HTLC would be indistinguishable
> onchain from other uses of HTLC; assuming that HTLCs have other uses, this
> is a (small?) plus to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Binaries for bitcoin Core version 0.18.0rc2 are available from:
https://bitcoincore.org/bin/bitcoin-core-0.18.0/test.rc2/
Source code can be found in git under the signed tag
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/tree/v0.18.0rc2
This is a
